1354706662364; Wed,
05 Dec 2012 03:24:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.41.234 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 03:24:22 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <65D0C393-742B-4E3B-A817-8D0511A52F87@???>
References: <CALc5WvNbgxzYMOMRUSq-0pKkeuO9MHzt82qoJOpa=_1TVi37YQ@???>
<65D0C393-742B-4E3B-A817-8D0511A52F87@???>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 11:24:22 +0000
Message-ID: <CALc5WvOrU2Qam_97n9CdrJWFXarj_UuxvWCM=4T=fxR9ZmRQLw@???>
From: Matthew Daubney <matt@???>
To: Michael Watkin <michael@???>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0402a93562970604d01939b8
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn2hi46SG8urdksjDQaJNyc/SUXLyH6ygmfEpdy5NSyEMJxvyZn4zUdtmBM4QhPYJ1LrET2
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Wed,
05 Dec 2012 11:24:29 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.223.176
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: matt@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,
NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled
version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at
http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust
* [209.85.223.176 listed in list.dnswl.org]
* 0.0 NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP URI: Uses a dotted-decimal IP address in URL
* 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Cc: users@???
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Routing issues
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 11:24:29 -0000
--f46d0402a93562970604d01939b8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
This machine is also in that range. How annoying! What's the normal method
of resolving these? Harass Telstra?
(forgot to reply all)
On 5 December 2012 11:19, Michael Watkin <michael@???> wrote:
> I raised this with Andy as IPs in the 1.125.0.0/16 range (which has been
> allocated to Telstra) seem not to be routed upstream. From my VPS I get:
>
> traceroute to 1.125.81.4 (1.125.81.4), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
> 1 obstler.bitfolk.com (85.119.80.8) 0.155 ms 0.134 ms 0.123 ms
> 2 jump-gw-4.lon.bitfolk.com (85.119.80.4) 0.701 ms 0.695 ms 0.684 ms
> 3 jump-gw-4.lon.bitfolk.com (85.119.80.4) 0.805 ms !H * *
>
> On 5 Dec 2012, at 10:52, Matthew Daubney wrote:
>
> > Is anyone aware of any routing issues from Oz to Bitfolk? I'm doing some
> remote support on a machine down there and can't ping any bitfolk ips?
> >
> > -Matt Daubney
> > _______________________________________________
> > users mailing list
> > users@???
> > https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
--f46d0402a93562970604d01939b8
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<span style=3D"font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">This machine is=
also in that range. How annoying! What's the normal method of resolvin=
g these? Harass Telstra?</span><br><div><span style=3D"font-family:arial,sa=
ns-serif;font-size:13px"><br>
</span></div><div><span style=3D"font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13p=
x">(forgot to reply all)</span></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br><di=
v class=3D"gmail_quote">On 5 December 2012 11:19, Michael Watkin <span dir=
=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"
mailto:michael@pasdex.com" target=3D"_blank">michae=
l@???</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I raised this with Andy as IPs in the <a hre=
f=3D"
http://1.125.0.0/16" target=3D"_blank">1.125.0.0/16</a> range (which h=
as been allocated to Telstra) seem not to be routed upstream. From my VPS I=
get:<br>
<br>
traceroute to 1.125.81.4 (1.125.81.4), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets<br>
=A01 =A0<a href=3D"
http://obstler.bitfolk.com" target=3D"_blank">obstler.bi=
tfolk.com</a> (85.119.80.8) =A00.155 ms =A00.134 ms =A00.123 ms<br>
=A02 =A0<a href=3D"
http://jump-gw-4.lon.bitfolk.com" target=3D"_blank">jump=
-gw-4.lon.bitfolk.com</a> (85.119.80.4) =A00.701 ms =A00.695 ms =A00.684 ms=
<br>
=A03 =A0<a href=3D"
http://jump-gw-4.lon.bitfolk.com" target=3D"_blank">jump=
-gw-4.lon.bitfolk.com</a> (85.119.80.4) =A00.805 ms !H * *<br>
<div class=3D"im HOEnZb"><br>
On 5 Dec 2012, at 10:52, Matthew Daubney wrote:<br>
<br>
> Is anyone aware of any routing issues from Oz to Bitfolk? I'm doin=
g some remote support on a machine down there and can't ping any bitfol=
k ips?<br>
><br>
> -Matt Daubney<br>
</div><div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5">> ________________________=
_______________________<br>
> users mailing list<br>
> <a href=3D"
mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com">users@???</a>=
<br>
> <a href=3D"
https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users" target=3D=
"_blank">
https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
--f46d0402a93562970604d01939b8--
From phil@??? Wed Dec 05 12:29:46 2012
Received: from outpost-lonthl.vampire-slayers.com ([85.119.82.72]
helo=mailhost.vampire-slayers.com)
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <phil@???>) id 1TgE6k-0001Hl-9o
for users@???; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 12:29:46 +0000
Received: from gateway82.vampire-slayers.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.vampire-slayers.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D2B2402BD;
Wed, 5 Dec 2012 12:29:45 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [192.168.0.52] (unknown [192.168.0.52])
by gateway82.vampire
