Re: [bitfolk] iptables front-end?

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Nigel Rantor
Date:  
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] iptables front-end?
com (85.119.80.4) 0.805 ms !H * *

On 5 Dec 2012, at 10:52, Matthew Daubney wrote:

> Is anyone aware of any routing issues from Oz to Bitfolk? I'm doing =

some remote support on a machine down there and can't ping any bitfolk =
ips?
>=20
> -Matt Daubney
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users@???
> https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users




From matt@??? Wed Dec 05 11:24:29 2012
Received: from mail-ie0-f176.google.com ([209.85.223.176])
    by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
    (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <matt@???>) id 1TgD5Y-00070b-Sm
    for users@???; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 11:24:29 +0000
Received: by mail-ie0-f176.google.com with SMTP id 13so9425126iea.21
    for <users@???>; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 03:24:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
    d=google.com; s=20120113;
    h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
    :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state;
    bh=7twMoPIzA7jNtkI8gRRl8eyDop1Ar3nm6TvP1iNt9eg=;
    b=YTaWRyA0OJz/eoy6gm5QnCV1XfIVnTzhSFf/d1jGka1iMgecwBN2uLvqbwDjh4G5MZ
    5ovsqNH4RSMS6jX9+6w2T3XBdEaX79wTs5Emkz9f+w6rFfyMaMpAvRGMmvUyAWbO5lso
    XdXavCt1n13Byr0LF3+xtmJKyDfDbFAFJOt7icfxO3o3L/e2PxDyY3uHRQllD7qOFMo6
    /447VrBAWnNFPvfh8PRZfi+e7dl1iUl4ipbsdPT40NDYhJDgDjecPXMs3VZnSK3CWdJM
    DHcO/Y97Jo/oyBqrcYK/QXjFrvbz5RzDDnKqQCm83ZN/vWOg/Fi25Qza5O+bzP3mFhRX
    K/HQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.56.177 with SMTP id b17mr1247166igq.7.1354706662364; Wed,
    05 Dec 2012 03:24:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.41.234 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 03:24:22 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <65D0C393-742B-4E3B-A817-8D0511A52F87@???>
References: <CALc5WvNbgxzYMOMRUSq-0pKkeuO9MHzt82qoJOpa=_1TVi37YQ@???>
    <65D0C393-742B-4E3B-A817-8D0511A52F87@???>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 11:24:22 +0000
Message-ID: <CALc5WvOrU2Qam_97n9CdrJWFXarj_UuxvWCM=4T=fxR9ZmRQLw@???>
From: Matthew Daubney <matt@???>
To: Michael Watkin <michael@???>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0402a93562970604d01939b8
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn2hi46SG8urdksjDQaJNyc/SUXLyH6ygmfEpdy5NSyEMJxvyZn4zUdtmBM4QhPYJ1LrET2
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Wed,
    05 Dec 2012 11:24:29 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.223.176
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: matt@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
    spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,
    NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled
    version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at
    http://www.dnswl.org/, low *      trust
    *      [209.85.223.176 listed in list.dnswl.org]
    *  0.0 NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP URI: Uses a dotted-decimal IP address in URL
    *  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Cc: users@lis