Re: [bitfolk] Proving that you are you

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Andy Parkins
Date:  
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Proving that you are you
use the document has a "last modified" date
and we promised to notify this list of any updates. Probably what we
should do is just publish a revision history so that trivial changes
such as this don't need an announce email.

I've recorded that as a feature request:

    https://tools.bitfolk.com/redmine/issues/100


Cheers,
Andy

--=20
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting

--0et/Au7PJwzVwd4K
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEAREDAAYFAlCwvLoACgkQIJm2TL8VSQsxJgCeN1AmYnoAp+Pf3xj7nfxcAvLO
xi4AmQGAwLLXWN/OMwK+goMYBbuhTaT5
=/kLp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--0et/Au7PJwzVwd4K--


--===============0658876185==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
announce mailing list
announce@???
https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/announce

--===============0658876185==--



From kitchen@??? Sun Nov 25 04:25:36 2012
Received: from ds1254.dreamservers.com
    ([173.236.184.26] helo=inara.kitchen.io ident=postfix)
    by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
    (envelope-from <kitchen@???>) id 1TcTmh-00072j-Ng
    for users@???; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 04:25:36 +0000
Received: from fanty.home.kitchen.io (unknown
    [IPv6:2001:470:c:67c:2802:2ccf:87c:3fa4])
    by inara.kitchen.io (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB2E2FF9A8
    for <users@???>; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 20:34:15 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 20:25:07 -0800
From: Jeremy Kitchen <kitchen@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20121125042505.GA26243@???>
Mail-Followup-To: users@???
References: <20121124122530.GI19412@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
    protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20121124122530.GI19412@???>
X-URL: http://kitchen.io/
X-PGP-Key: http://blog.kitchen.io/text/6300CC3D.asc
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Sun,
    25 Nov 2012 04:25:35 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 173.236.184.26
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kitchen@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
    spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: AS26347 173.236.128.0/17
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none shortcircuit=no
    autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: 
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Terms and Conditions update (no actual changes in
 terms)
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 04:25:36 -0000



--PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 12:25:30PM +0000, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi,

[...]
> I mention it only because the document has a "last modified" date
> and we promised to notify this list of any updates. Probably what we
> should do is just publish a revision history so that trivial changes
> such as this don't need an announce email.
>=20
> I've recorded that as a feature request:
>=20
>     https://tools.bitfolk.com/redmine/issues/100


I think a simple github/bitbucket/etc repo might suffice? I think an
email should still go out to the list if there's a change, but having it
in the git repo would allow for people to easily see the differences
between versions and whatnot.

-Jeremy

--=20
=2EO.    Jeremy Kitchen     (o_
=2E.O   kitchen@???  //\
OOO  twitter.com/kitchen  V_/_


--PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=igy9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9--


From andy@??? Sun Nov 25 17:23:21 2012
Received: from andy by mail.bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
    (envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1TcfvN-0005rM-DF
    for users@???; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 17:23:21 +0000
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 17:23:21 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20121125172321.GW3867@???>
References: <20121113083545.GD3867@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Dispositi