Re: [bitfolk] Proving that you are you

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Dmitriy Kazimirov
Date:  
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Proving that you are you
8 listed in list.dnswl.org]
    * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
    *  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
    * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
    author's *       domain
    * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
    *  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
    *      valid
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Cc: users@???
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Editors was Re: iptables front-end?
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:53:01 -0000


--047d7b603b98e22cce04cc5259ca
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I too am very pleased with Sublime and have purchased a full license. The
autocomplete is marvelous, and the tools for multiple selection make
refactoring a breeze. Highly recommended.

Cheers,
Vic

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Dom Latter <bitfolk-users@???>wrote:

> Free softweare zealots look away now.
>
> I recently got pointed in the direction of Sublime Text:
> http://www.sublimetext.com/
>
> I have found it to be an absolutely superb programmer's editor.
> (GUI-based, I should point out).
>
> It is nagware, but the nag screen doesn't pop up all that often
> and I have come to the conclusion that it's well worth ~40 quid.
> (The "evaluation" period is indefinite).
>
> I'll be buying a licence as soon as the Round Tuit becomes available.
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> users mailing list
> users@???
> https://lists.bitfolk.com/**mailman/listinfo/users<https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>
>


--047d7b603b98e22cce04cc5259ca
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I too am very pleased with Sublime and have purchased a full license. The a=
utocomplete is=A0marvelous, and the tools for multiple selection make refac=
toring a breeze. Highly recommended.<div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>
Vic<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Dom=
Latter <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitfolk-users@latter.org" t=
arget=3D"_blank">bitfolk-users@???</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockqu=
ote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc s=
olid;padding-left:1ex">
Free softweare zealots look away now.<br>
<br>
I recently got pointed in the direction of Sublime Text:<br>
<a href=3D"http://www.sublimetext.com/" target=3D"_blank">http://www.sublim=
etext.com/</a><br>
<br>
I have found it to be an absolutely superb programmer&#39;s editor.<br>
(GUI-based, I should point out).<br>
<br>
It is nagware, but the nag screen doesn&#39;t pop up all that often<br>
and I have come to the conclusion that it&#39;s well worth ~40 quid.<br>
(The &quot;evaluation&quot; period is indefinite).<br>
<br>
I&#39;ll be buying a licence as soon as the Round Tuit becomes available.<b=
r>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
users mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com" target=3D"_blank">users@???=
tfolk.com</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users" target=3D"_bla=
nk">https://lists.bitfolk.com/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>

--047d7b603b98e22cce04cc5259ca--


From andy@??? Thu Oct 25 14:41:13 2012
Received: from andy by mail.bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
    (envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1TROcT-0006Nl-C4
    for users@???; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:41:13 +0000
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:41:13 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20121025144113.GA3867@???>
References: <50784356.7000708@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
    protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AbqILKDxnGTuOane"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <50784356.7000708@???>
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Thu,
    25 Oct 2012 14:41:13 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andy@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
    spamd0.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RELAYS shortcircuit=no
    autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Online backup providers
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:41:14 -0000



--AbqILKDxnGTuOane
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Seeing this today:

    Introducing BRIC (Bunch of Redundant Independent Clouds)
    http://bitcartel.wordpress.com/2012/10/21/rbic-redundant-bunch-of-indep=
endent-clouds/


made me think of this thread.

I've been keeping an interest in Tahoe-LAFS for some years but it's
always been rather slow and fiddly.

I've been wondering about doing a storage grid for backup, maybe
with two nodes in London and one at somewhere like Hetzner. No real
idea how to monetise it though when so many companies are giving it
away for free.

Also there is the rise of Ceph.. http://ceph.com/

Cheers,
Andy

--=20
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting

--AbqILKDxnGTuOane
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEAREDAAYFAlCJT4kACgkQIJm2TL8VSQvDugCg61k0C+Ee+cFKZ1hnornHdKjF
ZXUAoOkOXA6ZnrcJU+2vCIs0TU3Yn0pm
=ns8u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--AbqILKDxnGTuOane--


From ian@??? Thu Oct 25 22:12:13 2012
Received: from semi-divine.com ([85.119.83.38] helo=topcat.semi-divine.com)
    by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
    (envelope-from <ian@???>) id 1TRVev-000601-52
    for users@???; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 22:12:13 +0000
Received: from [192.168.0.23]
    (cpc3-nwrk4-2-0-cust250.12-1.cable.virginmedia.com [86.26.44.251])
    by topcat.semi-divine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7C12984677
    for <users@???>; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 22:12:12 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <5089B93B.3060202@???>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 23:12:11 +0100
From: Ian <ian@???>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
    rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@???
References: <50784356.7000708@???>
    <20121025144113.GA3867@???>
In-Reply-To: <20121025144113.GA3867@???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Thu,
    25 Oct 2012 22:12:13 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 85.119.83.38
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ian@???
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.bitfolk.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Online backup providers
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 22:12:13 -0000


Peet said:

> You have to decide if it's worth it. I've only once had to restore
> from backups (my mac, had to fall back to previous OS release).
> Local Time-Machine backup though.


Over the decades, I have had two sudden catastrophic failures of
'spinning' discs (one had the read head mechanism fall off but
fortunately that one had nothing important on, and one had some other
failure which one of the expensive recovery services threw their hands
up at... which did, although fortunately not much) and one of a microSD
card (I can live without the data, but I'm sad it went).

So I'm not quite so optimistic that I won't do a restore, even though
that's three out of 'quite a lot'.

> Why not host disk space (only for yourself) at home?


This is for the home kit :)


Andy said:

> Seeing this today:
>
>      Introducing BRIC (Bunch of Redundant Independent Clouds)
>      http://bitcartel.wordpress.com/2012/10/21/rbic-redundant-bunch-of-independent-clouds/


Interesting, thank you.

Ian


From announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@??? Fri Oct 26 12:49:26 2012
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bitfolk.com)
    by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from
    <announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@???>)
    id 1TRjLq-0004ew-4W
    for users@???; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 12:49:26 +0000
Received: from andy by mail.bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
    (envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1TRjLl-0004dq-66
    for announce@???; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 12:49:21 +0000
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 12:49:21 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: announce@???
Message-ID: <20121026124921.GA19412@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Fri,
    26 Oct 2012 12:49:21 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
    spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RELAYS shortcircuit=no
    autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
X-BeenThere: announce@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0247042390=="
Sender: announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@???
Errors-To: announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@???
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Fri,
    26 Oct 2012 12:49:26 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@???
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.bitfolk.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Subject: [bitfolk] Another Exim remote code execution exploit
X-BeenThere: users@???
Reply-To: users@???
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 12:49:26 -0000



--===============0247042390==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
    protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AsxXAMtlQ5JHofzM"
Content-Disposition: inline



--AsxXAMtlQ5JHofzM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

It's time to check if you need to update Exim:

    https://lists.exim.org/lurker/message/20121026.080330.74b9147b.en.html


If you run Debian and Exim=E2=80=94which I know is lots of you=E2=80=94then=
you do need to.

Cheers,
Andy

--=20
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting

--AsxXAMtlQ5JHofzM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEAREDAAYFAlCKhtEACgkQIJm2TL8VSQtO4ACgp3J9K5reSrFtdmxg4RyNgYMo
i/IAoLxRvhZj7Xbizoj1IEGuTtFbkXNm
=n1Ab
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--AsxXAMtlQ5JHofzM--


--===============0247042390==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7b