Re: [bitfolk] Proving that you are you

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Aaron B. Russell
Date:  
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Proving that you are you
gle.com ([74.125.83.48])
    by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
    (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <vic.gbsmith@???>)
    id 1TOmmi-0006sZ-GF
    for users@???; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:53:01 +0000
Received: by mail-ee0-f48.google.com with SMTP id b45so5050406eek.21
    for <users@???>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 02:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
    h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
    :cc:content-type;
    bh=VZQXoFuSv3T0O4dJMyObRH11uPgTt9OgGzTFP1hERy8=;
    b=MaAlsKs+Tv+cXm2tEKg07n/WF0UYrUthQCP62JFzYcw24GpulKYRmgy/1//RHDh2Rl
    LnzXPWEGdaE1YSJ8oWCiJm13HVMvRPb51O7ypsRuGaRacABs69bAgWNrZiVBbyigMRZP
    I2/ajgkv97xROA7yEioBFKZE0wai9HLywqHMEi0NPgTTJKdh1GkDXGnd0UwNM+uPr3JK
    vyXu4T06VRZ9NO5q0TgIDgN3KGRc3/DKxXXcZs57z89ebXdS9Ue3zg2sacAa1V65MUlF
    m3AS01lm/1K9GOliN87gD2jeDgnjB32nF41QjsrsjYu6HJUi75YxSsAgD6jeYuvmnP74
    Y/Cg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.14.214.133 with SMTP id c5mr30448495eep.8.1350553974221; Thu,
    18 Oct 2012 02:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.14.129.200 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 02:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <507FCDC7.50509@???>
References: <CA+q7HTwsEfGBwXVW9xANKWXSW8DB2uao+pjc5LekZC5gzYvP-w@???>
    <507DAFA8.4080501@???>
    <CAHKeXQ3sCrXvqN=dZmLT6ORGdfD8xH-mjLtCjqcSiZrqA1TgZA@???>
    <20121017144300.427e721d@???>
    <20121017135950.GQ11377@???> <507FCDC7.50509@???>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 10:52:54 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEkujBVLw7WcPbGccjSid+mqbUVdJ4CnL+LR_Eesu9zNMhJBkw@???>
From: Vic Smith <vic.gbsmith@???>
To: Dom Latter <bitfolk-users@???>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b603b98e22cce04cc5259ca
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Thu,
    18 Oct 2012 09:53:00 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 74.125.83.48
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: vic.gbsmith@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
    spamd2.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 74.125.0.0/16
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
    DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no
    autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at
    http://www.dnswl.org/, low *      trust
    *      [74.125.83.48 listed in list.dnswl.org]
    * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
    *  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
    * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
    author's *       domain
    * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
    *  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
    *      valid
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Cc: users@???
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Editors was Re: iptables front-end?
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:53:01 -0000


--047d7b603b98e22cce04cc5259ca
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I too am very pleased with Sublime and have purchased a full license. The
autocomplete is marvelous, and the tools for multiple selection make
refactoring a breeze. Highly recommended.

Cheers,
Vic

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Dom Latter <bitfolk-users@???>wrote:

> Free softweare zealots look away now.
>
> I recently got pointed in the direction of Sublime Text:
> http://www.sublimetext.com/
>
> I have found it to be an absolutely superb programmer's editor.
> (GUI-based, I should point out).
>
> It is nagware, but the nag screen doesn't pop up all that often
> and I have come to the conclusion that it's well worth ~40 quid.
> (The "evaluation" period is indefinite).
>
> I'll be buying a licence as soon as the Round Tuit becomes available.
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> users mailing list
> users@???
> https://lists.bitfolk.com/**mailman/listinfo/users<https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>
>


--047d7b603b98e22cce04cc5259ca
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I too am very pleased with Sublime and have purchased a full license. The a=
utocomplete is=A0marvelous, and the tools for multiple selection make refac=
toring a breeze. Highly recommended.<div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>
Vic<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Dom=
Latter <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitfolk-users@latter.org" t=
arget=3D"_blank">bitfolk-users@???</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockqu=
ote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc s=
olid;padding-left:1ex">
Free softweare zealots look away now.<br>
<br>
I recently got