On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Andy Smith <andy@???> wrote:
> We do, however occasionally lose custom due to not supporting 64-bit
> guests.
With the very nice infrastructure (xen-shell, rescue image, etc.)
available, I don't see the lack of BitFolk blessed 64-bit install
images limiting at all.
FWIW, my own 480MiB VPS is running 64-bit Debian Squeeze that I
installed myself using a vanilla netboot/xen debian-installer image,
w/o too much effort.
Best regards,
Daniel
From ian@??? Wed Jun 06 17:08:02 2012
Received: from semi-divine.com ([85.119.83.38] helo=topcat.semi-divine.com)
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <ian@???>) id 1ScJiE-0000qA-9T
for users@???; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 17:08:02 +0000
Received: from mail-pz0-f48.google.com (mail-pz0-f48.google.com
[209.85.210.48])
by topcat.semi-divine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D29C08469E
for <users@???>; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 17:07:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dadz8 with SMTP id z8so10671286dad.21
for <users@???>; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 10:07:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.201.136 with SMTP id ka8mr25764400pbc.124.1339002472245;
Wed, 06 Jun 2012 10:07:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.143.15.21 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 10:07:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.143.15.21 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 10:07:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOOtku86o8buDXHpHYsYcYQrP5cm5Z3dm2tT5nOQfXQXT7JgEg@???>
References: <20120528144346.GX3867@???>
<4FC3C56E.7030302@???>
<20120604083741.GB24956@???>
<CAHORQ3cwda6GaKCTsEXOgR4meYbzNaAwU1aAnqJzBVGa3s+nmQ@???>
<CAOOtku86o8buDXHpHYsYcYQrP5cm5Z3dm2tT5nOQfXQXT7JgEg@???>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 18:07:52 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFTQQEngYe9w2Fq9vEXQwFXk3RQg8Ly-_OdgxxLL7HZMkQ1+WQ@???>
From: Ian <ian@???>
To: users <users@???>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8fb20784b62ab404c1d0ce62
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Wed,
06 Jun 2012 17:08:02 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 85.119.83.38
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ian@l
