XxeaqgHoJmS9DUI8W5t9gKZh9zrg0U4UhsHUGToyj7xNLF6J88yVwgnZmaZttP1NTHj
pzoLr4q5I8mOJ2YUym2ZVA6oApQcngic5dqIhTtTQXmtRJwsJG7W3Ui/XK/ZtesA6Z33
sBbA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.77.74 with SMTP id c50mr2821544yhe.112.1338983520534; Wed,
06 Jun 2012 04:52:00 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: daniel.neri@???
Received: by 10.236.80.106 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 04:52:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120528144346.GX3867@???>
References: <20120528144346.GX3867@???>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 13:52:00 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: MPZkWJTqcXO1IOb8AH11waqtEWQ
Message-ID: <CAOpGBFQHpJJ8AEdO+0J7XU7Gp4SLcJSXzUaQS26D_ChvFnFZqw@???>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_N=E9ri?= <daniel.neri+bitfolk@???>
To: users@???
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Wed,
06 Jun 2012 11:52:08 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.160.176
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: daniel.neri@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd1.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
DKIM_VALID_AU, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's * domain
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
* 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
* valid
* -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
low * trust
* [209.85.160.176 listed in list.dnswl.org]
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] 64-bit support
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:52:13 -0000
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Andy Smith <andy@???> wrote:
> We do, however occasionally lose custom due to not supporting 64-bit
> guests.
With the very nice infrastructure (xen-shell, rescue image, etc.)
available, I don't see the lack of BitFolk blessed 64-bit install
images limiting at all.
FWIW, my own 480MiB VPS is running 64-bit Debian Squeeze that I
installed myself using a vanilla netboot/xen debian-installer image,
w/o too much effort.
Best regards,
Daniel
From ian@??? Wed Jun 06 17:08:02 2012
Received: from semi-divine.com ([85.119.83.38] helo=topcat.semi-divine.com)
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <ian@???>) id 1ScJiE-0000qA-9T
for users@???; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 17:08:02 +0000
Received: from mail-pz0-f48.google.com (mail-pz0-f48.google.com
[209.85.210.48])
