* [74.125.82.52 listed in list.dnswl.org]
* -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's * domain
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
* 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
* valid
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 05:19:26 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] backups (was Re: hardware problems on barbar,
1826Z and ongoing)
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 13:14:49 -0000
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Miah Gregory <miah@???> wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 09:22 +0000, Andy Smith wrote:
>
>> Seems like most people only back up data and configuration though.
>
> I back up the entire disk image personally, the change set between
> backups is generally zero for system binaries etc, plus it provides a
> useful audit tool should any box get hacked.
>
> It also means when restoring that I don't need to worry about whether or
> not the box will restore into a working state or not due to package
> updates or config/running state stored in non-standard locations.
>
> Just my 2p though, I tend to be overly zealous about these things. :)
>
Hey, I don't think it's overly zealous at all.
This is what I would like, but I thought it would put an overhead on
the service provided for everyone if everyone backed up using this
approach.
I'm intrigued as to how you're doing this :-) Are you dd'ing
partitions or something? O.o
Cheers, Gerald
From andy@??? Wed Jun 06 05:41:19 2012
Received: from andy by mail.bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1Sc8z5-0005We-Cq
for users@???; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 05:41:13 +0000
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 05:40:43 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20120606054036.GG11695@???>
References: <20120530190217.GB11695@???>
<20120530222751.GC11695@???>
<20120531024807.GD11695@???>
<20120531051054.GE11695@???>
<20120604082935.GA24956@???>
<20120605015149.GK11695@???>
<4FCDCA55.1040101@???>
<20120605092254.GQ11695@???>
<1338900821.9733.3.camel@???>
<CAEZ5awF6g0f=aVtYNxRxaGU+KFomJO+6QWDRu+H=xq7C_COdHg@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DITGHUV3p5DjDsXt"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAEZ5awF6g0f=aVtYNxRxaGU+KFomJO+6QWDRu+H=xq7C_COdHg@???>
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Wed,
06 Jun 2012 05:40:51 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andy@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd1.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RELAYS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] backups (was Re: hardware problems on barbar,
1826Z and ongoing)
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 05:41:24 -0000
--DITGHUV3p5DjDsXt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 02:14:21PM +0100, Gerald Davies wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Miah Gregory <miah@???> wrote:
> > I back up the entire disk image personally [=E2=80=A6]
[=E2=80=A6]
> This is what I would like, but I thought it would put an overhead on
> the service provided for everyone if everyone backed up using this
> approach.
At the moment the only metric we're charging by for the backups is
the dis
