Re: [bitfolk] VPS renumbering failure

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Graham Bleach
Date:  
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] VPS renumbering failure
    <20120531024807.GD11695@???>
    <20120531051054.GE11695@???>
    <bcaaaf24a8d85444ce66876707cf7ff7.squirrel@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <bcaaaf24a8d85444ce66876707cf7ff7.squirrel@???>
Sender: Paul Tansom <paul@???>
Envelope_from: Paul Tansom <paul@???>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Thu,
    31 May 2012 22:31:23 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 78.33.48.14
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: paul@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
    spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: AS8468 78.32.0.0/15
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
    shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at
    http://www.dnswl.org/, no *      trust
    *      [78.33.48.14 listed in list.dnswl.org]
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] hardware problems on barbar, 1826Z and ongoing
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 22:31:24 -0000


** Jan Henkins <jan@???> [2012-05-31 14:29]:
> Just a quick kudos -
>
> None of my VPSs were affected, but I can tell you I really appreciate the
> way you look after us. You are the consummate pro.

** end quote [Jan Henkins]

Seconded. Mine was, but how you deal with a problem is a better recommendation
than never having a problem and not knowing. That sort of sounds backwards, but
it gives confidence that problems will be dealt with properly.

--
Paul Tansom | Aptanet Ltd. | http://www.aptanet.com/ | 023 9238 0001
Registered in England | Company No: 4905028 | Registered Office:
Crawford House, Hambledon Road, Denmead, Waterlooville, Hants, PO7 6NU


From andy@??? Tue Jun 05 01:51:49 2012
Received: from andy by mail.bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
    (envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1Sbiw1-0004jf-9D
    for users@???; Tue, 05 Jun 2012 01:51:49 +0000
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 01:51:49 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20120605015149.GK11695@???>
References: <20120530190217.GB11695@???>
    <20120530222751.GC11695@???>
    <20120531024807.GD11695@???>
    <20120531051054.GE11695@???>
    <20120604082935.GA24956@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
    protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="j3zO+32zXj6UcJCE"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120604082935.GA24956@???>
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Tue,
    05 Jun 2012 01:51:49 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andy@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16