benden.pern>
In-Reply-To: <CANrmF70r4nKgcw4q0-ZgJ69ChJPQ4eV38OAFywXWKG5V-D3Nbg@???>
References: <CANrmF72B+RJtPBtcJGyLXr7H5Fd8TwtxCoqHrQ_J+pydOK6Kpg@???>
<4FBF1F49.4050906@???>
<CANrmF70r4nKgcw4q0-ZgJ69ChJPQ4eV38OAFywXWKG5V-D3Nbg@???>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-Smarthost01-IP: [82.70.125.126]
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Fri,
25 May 2012 08:29:57 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 212.23.1.1
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: zen57162@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd2.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN: AS13037 212.23.0.0/19
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report:
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] sending (and potentially receiving) email from my VPS
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 08:29:58 -0000
On Fri, 25 May 2012 08:10:01 +0100
Philip Hunt <cabalamat@???> wrote:
> On 25 May 2012 06:57, Ross Younger <ross@???> wrote:
> > On 25/05/12 16:37, Philip Hunt wrote:
> >>
> >> Does Bitfolk have an SMTP server that I could use for this? Or
> >> should I use Google SMTP server?
> >
> >
> > Is there some reason you don't want your VPS to act as a full
> > first-class internet mail system?
>
> Not really, other than it might be a hassle to set up.
>
> > I was under the impression that that was what most
> > customers did.
>
> If that's the favoured way of doing it, then I'm happy to do it that
> way, I suppose.
I suspect I am in a minority as I route any email addressed to my
domain, hosted on bitfolk, to me via my ISP. I have always used the
smtp mail service provided by my ISP.
I know Andy, amongst others, doesn't recommend this because it means
changing email addresses on change of ISP but I cannot foresee me
moving away from Zen as I have been very happy with their service
since I moved to them several years ago.
I originally used the company that cabled Bournemouth before
being taken over by ntl/virgin. I shifted to Zen when I got fed up with
the service provided by virgin - moved from cable tv to freesat
at same time - and was happy that I had done so as we moved to an
un-cabled area shortly after.
I don't need the ability to get mail from anywhere other than home so
have never tried any web-mail service. I trust commercial companies
like google to stick to any privacy promises only as long as it suits
them.
--
John Lewis
Debian & the GeneWeb genealogical data server
From cgdennis@??? Fri May 25 10:01:19 2012
Received: from nm22-vm5.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.10.251])
by mail.bitfolk.com with smtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <cgdennis@???>) id 1SXrKh-00029y-A4
for users@???; Fri, 25 May 2012 10:01:19 +0000
Received: from [217.146.183.215] by nm22.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
25 May 2012 10:01:13 -0000
Received: from [217.146.183.203] by tm8.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
25 May 2012 10:01:13 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1001.bt.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
25 May 2012 10:01:13 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 478225.68939.bm@???
Received: (qmail 98429 invoked from network); 25 May 2012 10:01:13 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com;
h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
b=i/Bi3Yim3jMQVlDJtuZwg6E1U8HQbRFzU5o1LCoB9EAnr5GFbeHp++CezSNQdzWE5xVBHeuML49HlhX5t/J6ZJeMmzN6ERJ6dBrZBUz2BXa5j62vlbAT5VP6GqD23Yxsg/+lnO65Wymn+/MwK5bNBayASkIil/DOp63vQXe0+PM=
;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024;
t=1337940073; bh=lgriVpSXV9vg
