[bitfolk] Disclosure of information to referrers

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Andy Smith
Date:  
Subject: [bitfolk] Disclosure of information to referrers
ad3.darksilence.net>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 14:28:37 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJDzH8it5h29xi+gFSG4nOpzvDVtAYG9ned_YYWb5rhzDA4OMA@???>
From: James Gregory <jgxenite@???>
Cc: users@???
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Thu,
    24 May 2012 13:28:44 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.215.48
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jgxenite@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
    spamd2.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
    DKIM_VALID_AU, MISSING_HEADERS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
    SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at
    http://www.dnswl.org/, low *      trust
    *      [209.85.215.48 listed in list.dnswl.org]
    * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
    *  1.2 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header
    * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
    author's *       domain
    * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
    *  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
    *      valid
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Testing out apt-cacher-ng for Debian/Ubuntu package
    caching
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 13:28:44 -0000


Seems to work OK to me.

Did seem to initially fail as it was trying to connect over IPv6, and
I'm not sure IPv6 is correctly configured on VM. Once I disabled IPv6,
it seemed to work OK.

On 24 May 2012 14:27, Miah Gregory <miah@???> wrote:
> +1
> Seems faster to me, too.
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Miah
>
> DSIS - IT Support and Consultancy
> 0141 4382030
> http://www.dsis.co.uk/
> DSIS is a trading name of Dark Silence Ltd, registered in Scotland SC341532
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: john lewis <zen57162@???>
> To: users@???
> Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Testing out apt-cacher-ng for Debian/Ubuntu
> package caching
> Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 14:25:20 +0100
> Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 13:13:44 +0000
> Andy Smith <andy@???> wrote:
>
>> If you're a customer running Debian or Ubuntu then you're most
>> likely making use of our apt-cacher. The apt-cacher is quite an old
>> version, has a few small problems, and doesn't support IPv6.
>>
>> I'm looking to replace it with apt-cacher-ng but I'd like to test it
>> some more first.
>>
>> If you'd like to help test it, please could you replace any instance
>> of "apt-cacher" in your /etc/apt/sources.list with "test-cacher"?
>
> OK
>
> I won't tell you if it works ;-)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users@???
> https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users



From andy@??? Thu May 24 13:37:00 2012
Received: from andy by mail.bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
    (envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1SXYDs-0005JA-1Z
    for users@???; Thu, 24 May 2012 13:37:00 +0000
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 13:36:59 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20120524133659.GU12360@???>
References: <20120524131344.GS12360@???>
    <20120524142520.3efe08f2@???>
    <1337866025.5051.24.camel@???>
    <CAJDzH8it5h29xi+gFSG4nOpzvDVtAYG9ned_YYWb5rhzDA4OMA@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
    protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nbjgUHX6eyHhY7pW"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJDzH8it5h29xi+gFSG4nOpzvDVtAYG9ned_YYWb5rhzDA4OMA@???>
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Thu,
    24 May 2012 13:37:00 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andy@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
    spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RELAYS shortcircuit=no
    autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Testing out apt-cacher-ng for Debian/Ubuntu package
 caching
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mail