13;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type; bh=xI5YS0F+XdotJLIIlS2K6Tj04O1xQdoLVYX3JyP+bo4=;
b=On+umRf1rUzXZETYF025BNd84+wXUId+0mDjrfQPKaYzMuDG0nU+2Q2um05LKxoBOB
vreQ/QWCYpHb2IO5jdVvfYMxHjSOs+uqtlD4MFtGm+tJkWyLXY/89tpYT5P6V039ytnl
fHA+42awMG5t9rmpqjRyHMJrLWiJ1bEttqm2+f4HDHXANKOrT4/7ci5/SO5meQqxAdFq
/lMuf8wLHr8gCazI9vKbY8RxQulhF9ez84VRi4MHZjUhvBxKHfhxBEV0/+7zOCUCV+UB
nfPmdm90o/hrkG2fO4wqw38JfMe0zAU/wvjp5fdzfJTBKeFJRGRwpNognOkKbguTA/3J
89tA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.30.73 with SMTP id q9mr779332lbh.30.1331720959661; Wed, 14
Mar 2012 03:29:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.130.196 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 03:29:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOGWvnEyebnhX=FRG44Sm4msB2nnfx46Ghu_yG+-PmGrLmjZNg@???>
References: <CAL7LUj_b6aigz68cr2BwTLY61h7xQr_j9PrYw26Or69Wzq4a1A@???>
<CAOOtku__64qsUkjy1cs8LzmojF5ZcxEUhweBGyfZdT5oOsXUgA@???>
<CAL7LUj8J4GxO4EXCKJYuZxaQQ44fJgfEg_ViUEjUn5KKfmrqnw@???>
<CAOGWvnEyebnhX=FRG44Sm4msB2nnfx46Ghu_yG+-PmGrLmjZNg@???>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 06:29:19 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL7LUj9E1byJZ65M=PtmywH5N8HStxLa4Kt0Om80-QfQSKQcXA@???>
From: S P <sundancecloud@???>
To: users@???
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec554d986bd94eb04bb3172e6
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Wed,
14 Mar 2012 10:29:25 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.215.48
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: sundancecloud@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd2.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
low * trust * [209.85.215.48 listed in list.dnswl.org]
* -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
* 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's * domain
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
* 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
* valid
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Suggestions for email hosting company
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:29:26 -0000
--bcaec554d986bd94eb04bb3172e6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Mike, thanks for the info on simplymailsolutions.
Yes, I also use Google Apps for Business; it works quite well. The reason
to go outside of Google is that I need at least one solid external account
to use as a backup address for Google (e.g. lost password, etc) and also to
diversify (!).
- Sandy
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Mike Zanker <mike@???> wrote:
> On 13 March 2012 23:22, S P <sundancecloud@???> wrote:
>
> > So, I've found my solution: a mixture of gandi and simplymailsolutions.
> I'll
> > try one domain on gandi to see how it works out.
>
> Just a comment about simplymailsolutions. I had an IMAP account with
> them 2 or 3 years ago and found th
