.4 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
DKIM_VALID_AU, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
* medium trust
* [64.18.1.185 listed in list.dnswl.org]
* -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's * domain
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
* 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
* valid
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Suggestions for email hosting company
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 09:14:38 -0000
On 13 March 2012 23:22, S P <sundancecloud@???> wrote:
> So, I've found my solution: a mixture of gandi and simplymailsolutions. I'll
> try one domain on gandi to see how it works out.
Just a comment about simplymailsolutions. I had an IMAP account with
them 2 or 3 years ago and found that it was very slow if you set your
MUA (Thunderbird in my case) to check more than 2 or 3 folders. Their
support were helpful but couldn't identify any issues at their end
(despite other IMAP servers I was using being fine). They have most
likely upgraded their infrastructure since then but thought I'd
mention it anyway.
I personally use Google Apps for Business now for my domain which has
worked extremely well (and allows some in my family to continue using
Outlook for mail/calendar/contacts :) )
Mike
From sundancecloud@??? Wed Mar 14 10:29:26 2012
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f48.google.com ([209.85.215.48])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <sundancecloud@???>)
id 1S7lSP-0005in-N3
for users@???; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:29:26 +0000
Received: by lagu2 with SMTP id u2so1916843lag.21
for <users@???>; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 03:29:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type; bh=xI5YS0F+XdotJLIIlS2K6Tj04O1xQdoLVYX3JyP+bo4=;
b=On+umRf1rUzXZETYF025BNd84+wXUId+0mDjrfQPKaYzMuDG0nU+2Q2um05LKxoBOB
vreQ/QWCYpHb2IO5jdVvfYMxHjSOs+uqtlD4MFtGm+tJkWyLXY/89tpYT5P6V039ytnl
fHA+42awMG5t9rmpqjRyHMJrLWiJ1bEttqm2+f4HDHXANKOrT4/7ci5/SO5meQqxAdFq
/lMuf8wLHr8gCazI9vKbY8RxQulhF9ez84VRi4MHZjUhvBxKHfhxBEV0/+7zOCUCV+UB
nfPmdm90o/hrkG2fO4wqw38JfMe0zAU/wvjp5fdzfJTBKeFJRGRwpNognOkKbguTA/3J
89tA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.30.73 with SMTP id q9mr779332lbh.30.1331720959661; Wed, 14
Mar 2012 03:29:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.130.196 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 03:29:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOGWvnEyebnhX=FRG44Sm4msB2nnfx46Ghu_yG+-PmGrLmjZNg@???>
References: <CAL7LUj_b6aigz68cr2BwTLY61h7xQr_j9PrYw26Or69Wzq4a1A@???>
<CAOOtku__64qsUkjy1cs8LzmojF5ZcxEUhweBGyfZdT5oOsXUgA@???>
<CAL7LUj8J4GxO4EXCKJYuZxaQQ44fJgfEg_ViUEjUn5KKfmrqnw@???>
<CAOGWvnEyebnhX=FRG44Sm4msB2nnfx46Ghu_yG+-PmGrLmjZNg@???>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 06:29:19 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL7LUj9E1byJZ65M=PtmywH5N8HStxLa4Kt0Om80-QfQSKQcXA@???>
From: S P <sundancecloud@???>
To: users@???
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec554d986bd94eb04bb3172e6
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Wed,
14 Mar 2012 10:29:25 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.215.48
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: sundancecloud@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd2.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
low * trust * [209.85.215.48 listed in list.dnswl.org]
* -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
* 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's * domain
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
* 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
* valid
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Suggestions for email hosting company
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https:
