211163720.GW32046@???>
References: <CALdaYd06o3HAm_p+C7Qn87FJJbBftEiEm1FMBs_dDf4PkNF5yA@???>
<20120211152619.GF23380@???>
<CALdaYd3_K6W9s-E7ErUY68xXqFsB3rZxWEFCDAGBbvYRd+3CpA@???>
<20120211163138.GV32046@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6s/G0Ait2f6IH9MX"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120211163138.GV32046@???>
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Sat,
11 Feb 2012 16:37:20 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andy@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd0.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RELAYS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Tor Obsfucation
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:37:21 -0000
--6s/G0Ait2f6IH9MX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Daniel,
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 04:31:38PM +0000, Andy Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 03:39:25PM +0000, Daniel Case wrote:
> > Do I still need to block 22 and 25 for a bridge?
>=20
> A bridge doesn't send packets to the non-Tor Internet so I don't
> think it matters what your exit policy is in that case. I'm not even
> sure a bridge can have an exit policy, since it isn't an exit..
Sorry I think I've misunderstood slightly. I thought you were asking
about running Tor itself. I am not familiar with the obfuscating
proxy part of Tor so I don't know how it interacts with exit
policies. I suggest asking the Tor developers.
If it sends packets to the normal Internet like a Tor exit node does
then yes you do need to block ports 25 and 22, but that might be
taken care of by your usual exit policy.
Cheers,
Andy
--=20
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
--6s/G0Ait2f6IH9MX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREDAAYFAk82mUAACgkQIJm2TL8VSQsy9wCg2FyfwGFgd8o8Ppp/p56Gz1Pk
zq8An0/5aTQ8rsQYRs222KGA6X0V9LqC
=6VTb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--6s/G0Ait2f6IH9MX--
From danielcase10@??? Sat Feb 11 16:38:27 2012
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f48.google.com ([209.85.215.48])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <danielcase10@???>)
id 1RwFxz-0005lQ-66
for users@???; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:38:27 +0000
Received: by lagw12 with SMTP id w12so4540342lag.21
for <users@???>; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:38:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=2zaWZRAFpXGwuGJ2CCAV+Q0i1W+wMqpI6wWSW0sDDYc=;
b=L02jeZ2qPTJZRh09O9LRf7tHmXAb+1XklxtmKhZ3E/utX+/v8DKi9R2RDxz9yFECXs
xZV5I0/DrIrk8+prtzOCFbf9ItcuvUD7O9+96LbK6SDoGohkUlQDwPRkOS/nqqXzNgoL
3xmph6s1dXdPMzS0L7ZYLOrG/slRMy6cjwnmg=
Received: by 10.112.100.34 with SMTP id ev2mr3617370lbb.13.1328978301161; Sat,
11 Feb 2012 08:38:21 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.112.232 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:38:01 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20120211163138.GV32046@???>
References: <CALdaYd06o3HAm_p+C7Qn87FJJbBftEiEm1FMBs_dDf4PkNF5yA@???>
<20120211152619.GF23380@???>
<CALdaYd3_K6W9s-E7ErUY68xXqFsB3rZxWEFCDAGBbvYRd+3CpA@???>
<20120211163138.GV32046@???>
From: Daniel Case <d
