2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:14:37 -0000
I said
> in /etc now comes up with one hit, in ntp.conf:
>
> > # and admin.curacao.bitfolk.com (nagios)
> > restrict 212.13.194.71
>
> so I changed that to 85.119.80.238 and 85.119.80.244 per the customer
> information page on the website and restarted ntp.
Looking, I should have added these two ages ago, but I suspect I am not
the only one who didn't...
Ian
From andy@??? Mon Jan 30 00:41:49 2012
Received: from andy by mail.bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1RrfJd-0004mx-Hj
for users@???; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:41:49 +0000
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:41:49 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20120130004149.GP23380@???>
References: <4F25CF99.4070900@???> <4F25E0E8.70000@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rwlp4HDnqjg7pxzw"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4F25E0E8.70000@???>
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Mon,
30 Jan 2012 00:41:49 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andy@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RELAYS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] IP renumbering
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:41:49 -0000
--rwlp4HDnqjg7pxzw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Ian,
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:14:32AM +0000, Ian wrote:
>> in /etc now comes up with one hit, in ntp.conf:
>>
>> > # and admin.curacao.bitfolk.com (nagios)
>> > restrict 212.13.194.71
>>
>> so I changed that to 85.119.80.238 and 85.119.80.244 per the customer
>> information page on the website and restarted ntp.
>
> Looking, I should have added these two ages ago, but I suspect I am not =
=20
> the only one who didn't...
Allowing nagios's IP addresses to query your ntp server is only
required if it's being monitored by BitFolk. So either it makes no
difference or else alerts start firing and you notice. :)
Some relevant links:
http://bitfolk.com/customer_information.html#toc_3_NTP___London__UK
http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/message/20110911.044100.9a55e70c.en.html
Cheers,
Andy
--=20
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
--rwlp4HDnqjg7pxzw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREDAAYFAk8l500ACgkQIJm2TL8VSQvd5QCeIRok26IbmU1oYfHgcHetGSmQ
i78AnRBE/n/ed+UBHgWqbQRXCeDNHu8V
=p+o1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--rwlp4HDnqjg7pxzw--
From announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@??? Tue Jan 31 16:03:15 2012
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bitfolk.com)
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from
<announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@???>)
id 1RsGAt-0000BA-D3
for users@???; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:03:15 +0000
Received: from andy by mail.bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1RsGAo-0000A6-C0
for announce@???; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:03:10 +0000
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:03:10 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: announce@???
Message-ID: <20120131160310.GO23380@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Tue,
3
