ormat=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Sun,
29 Jan 2012 23:00:45 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 85.119.83.38
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ian@???
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.bitfolk.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Subject: [bitfolk] IP renumbering
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 23:00:45 -0000
Hi,
Some of this was easy (changing where the slave DNSes got their info
from was a simple sed search and replace) and some tedious (changing all
the master DNS where because of needing to change the serial number for
all of them, this was done by hand via a control panel - if there was an
easier way, I am not sure I want to know now :) )
The one thing not mentioned on the wiki is that doing
> grep -r 212.13.19 *
in /etc now comes up with one hit, in ntp.conf:
> # and admin.curacao.bitfolk.com (nagios)
> restrict 212.13.194.71
so I changed that to 85.119.80.238 and 85.119.80.244 per the customer
information page on the website and restarted ntp.
Now I think it's just a case of waiting for the rest of the net to
notice the DNS changes...
Ian
From ian@??? Mon Jan 30 00:14:37 2012
Received: from semi-divine.com ([85.119.83.38] helo=topcat.semi-divine.com)
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <ian@???>) id 1RretJ-0003y8-AI
for users@???; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:14:37 +0000
Received: from [192.168.0.23]
(cpc3-nwrk4-2-0-cust250.12-1.cable.virginmedia.com [86.26.44.251])
by topcat.semi-divine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 11B6F8467D
for <users@???>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:14:34 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4F25E0E8.70000@???>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:14:32 +0000
From: Ian <ian@???>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:9.0) Gecko/20111229 Thunderbird/9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@???
References: <4F25CF99.4070900@???>
In-Reply-To: <4F25CF99.4070900@???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Mon,
30 Jan 2012 00:14:37 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 85.119.83.38
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ian@???
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.bitfolk.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] IP renumbering
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:14:37 -0000
I said
> in /etc now comes up with one hit, in ntp.conf:
>
> > # and admin.curacao.bitfolk.com (nagios)
> > restrict 212.13.194.71
>
> so I changed that to 85.119.80.238 and 85.119.80.244 per the customer
> information page on the website and restarted ntp.
Looking, I should have added these two ages ago, but I suspect I am not
the only one who didn't...
Ian
From andy@??? Mon Jan 30 00:41:49 2012
Received: from andy by mail.bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1RrfJd-0004mx-Hj
for users@???; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:41:49 +0000
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:41:49 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20120130004149.GP23380@???>
References: <4F25CF99.4070900@???> <4F25E0E8.70000@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rwlp4HDnqjg7pxzw"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4F25E0E8.70000@???>
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Mon,
30 Jan 2012 00:41:49 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andy@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RELAYS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] IP renumbering
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:41:49 -0000
--rwlp4HDnqjg7pxzw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Ian,
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:14:32AM +0000, Ian wrote:
>> in /etc now comes up with one hit, in ntp.conf:
>>
>> > # and admin.curacao.bitfolk.com (nagios)
>> > restrict 212.13.194.71
>>
>> so I changed that to 85.119.80.238 and 85.119.80.244 per the customer
>> information page on the website and restarted ntp.
>
> Looking, I should have added these two ages ago, but I suspect I am not =
=20
> the only one who didn't...
Allowing nagios's IP addresses to query your ntp server is only
required if it's being monitored by BitFolk. So either it makes no
difference or else alerts start firing and you notice. :)
Some relevant links:
http://bitfolk.com/customer_information.html#toc_3_NTP___London__UK
http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/message/20110911.044100.9a55e70c.en.html
Cheers,
Andy
--=20
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
--rwlp4HDnqjg7pxzw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREDAAYFAk8l500ACgkQIJm2TL8VSQvd5QCeIRok26IbmU1oYfHgcHetGSmQ
i78AnRBE/n/ed+UBHgWqbQRXCeDNHu8V
=p+o1
-----END PGP
