Re: [bitfolk] Lenny to Squeeze

.11

Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:44:06 -0000

--20cf3005130e24e53904b75b4b1f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I must confess, straight off the bat, that this has nothing to do with
Bitfolk, but you're the most knowledgeable group of guys and gals I know
when it comes to Linuxy things.

What's considered "normal" when it comes to the size of a CPanel
installation? I've got a VPS with a US provider, and the CPanel folder is
over 2GB, and that just feels wrong to me, but I don't have anything for
comparison.

Kind regards

Murray Crane

--20cf3005130e24e53904b75b4b1f
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<font>I must confess, straight off the bat, that this has nothing to do wit=
h Bitfolk, but you&#39;re the most knowledgeable group of guys and gals I k=
now when it comes to Linuxy things.<br><br>What&#39;s considered &quot;norm=
al&quot; when it comes to the size of a CPanel installation? I&#39;ve got a=
VPS </font>with a US provider, and the CPanel folder is over 2GB, and that=
just feels wrong to me, but I don&#39;t have anything for comparison.<br>
<br clear=3D"all">Kind regards<br><br>Murray Crane<br><br>

--20cf3005130e24e53904b75b4b1f--

From ian@??? Wed Jan 25 15:17:30 2012
Received: from [85.119.83.38] (helo=topcat.semi-divine.com)
    by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
    (envelope-from <ian@???>) id 1Rq4bK-0005t4-Tb
    for users@???; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:17:30 +0000
Received: from [192.168.0.23]
    (cpc3-nwrk4-2-0-cust250.12-1.cable.virginmedia.com [86.26.44.251])
    by topcat.semi-divine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 24F68842FC
    for <users@???>; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:17:28 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4F201D07.7040305@???>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:17:27 +0000
From: Ian <ian@???>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
    rv:9.0) Gecko/20111229 Thunderbird/9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@???
References: <20110601222858.GC4363@???>    <cd0afa03743d0a48622e725fefcbec13.squirrel@???>    <20110601224603.GD4363@???>
    <4E3EED07.40408@???>    <20110807195916.GD5935@???>
    <4E3EF223.9070901@???>    <20110807202209.GL5968@???>
    <4E3EF573.2050101@???>    <20110807203357.GE5935@???>
    <4E40414E.90704@???> <20110808201035.GK5935@???>
    <4E41B36B.7090002@???> <4F133E16.5070303@???>
In-Reply-To: <4F133E16.5070303@???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-bitfolk.com-Metrics-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for
    85.119.83.38 (failed)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Wed,
    25 Jan 2012 15:17:30 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 85.119.83.38
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ian@???
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.bitfolk.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Lenny-to-Squeeze Upgrade Plan - 2nd opinions sought!
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:17:31 -0000

I said...

> 6. The oddity common to both is that although BIND9 is up and running..
>
> >/etc/init.d/bind9 status
> bind9 is running.
>
> .. and it's doing zone transfers, the BIND Webmin 1.570 module doesn't
> seem to think that