> Assuming that works, would I be right in thinking that this would
> require a customised anaconda RPM then, since the installer is
> pointed at an HTTP mirror?
Ah, apologies - that was actually with a Live CD before running the
installer to copy the image to disk :( I must admit to never having
tried it with net installs.
Regards,
Mike
From andy@??? Sun Jan 22 09:44:31 2012
Received: from andy by mail.bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1RotyQ-0004SQ-Q6
for users@???; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 09:44:31 +0000
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 09:44:30 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20120122094430.GS32046@???>
References: <CACGFHYC0Zh-LdGWxXHJ+UXprLF3OeWoduGwGRr3q0RtgRuwDtw@???>
<20120122080925.GV23380@???>
<CACGFHYDHWPP1WHXH+Q9_nWGfLmBXMefA+x5ebzRuQcmpVVi+sw@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XUmrTyVHrg2/ImRG"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CACGFHYDHWPP1WHXH+Q9_nWGfLmBXMefA+x5ebzRuQcmpVVi+sw@???>
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Sun,
22 Jan 2012 09:44:30 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andy@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,NO_RELAYS
shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
* 0.0 NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP URI: Uses a dotted-decimal IP address in URL
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Renumbering IPs and Bind
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 09:44:31 -0000
--XUmrTyVHrg2/ImRG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Michael,
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 02:24:04AM -0600, Michael Corliss wrote:
> The hostname is ilovephilosophy.com. It'd be great if it were just noise,
> but could it show the old IP with nslookup if it had actually changed?
Probably not, but I wanted to be sure.
Let's see what's going on then:
$ dig +noall +answer +auth +comments -t a ilovephilosophy.com
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 55221
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 3, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; ANSWER SECTION:
ilovephilosophy.com. 86365 IN A 212.13.195.254
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
ilovephilosophy.com. 86365 IN NS a.authns.bitfolk.com.
ilovephilosophy.com. 86365 IN NS c.authns.bitfolk.com.
ilovephilosophy.com. 86365 IN NS b.authns.bitfolk.com.
So yes, it seems DNS holds your old IP address.
Nameservers for this domain?:
$ dig +short -t ns ilovephilosophy.com
c.authns.bitfolk.com.
a.authns.bitfolk.com.
b.authns.bitfolk.com.
Only BitFolk.
What's the address record at each one, and your own server?:
$ for n in {a,b,c}.authns.bitfolk.com 85.119.83.25
