Hi Mike,
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 09:04:32AM +0000, Mike Zanker wrote:
> On 22 January 2012 07:07, Andy Smith <andy@???> wrote:
>
> > I can't find a simple way to override that check (please let me know
> > if you know of one), and I'm not quite ready to increase the default
> > RAM allocation to 512MiB.
>
> The workaround for low RAM in the past was to set the needed_ram
> variable in the anaconda script to 0. I haven't done that since RHEL
> 5, though, so it may not be the same in 6.
Assuming that works, would I be right in thinking that this would
require a customised anaconda RPM then, since the installer is
pointed at an HTTP mirror?
Cheers,
Andy
--
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
From mike@??? Sun Jan 22 09:31:10 2012
Received: from exprod6og115.obsmtp.com ([64.18.1.35])
by mail.bitfolk.com with smtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <mike@???>) id 1RotlV-0003xz-V6
for users@???; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 09:31:10 +0000
Received: from mail-pz0-f54.google.com ([209.85.210.54]) (using TLSv1) by
exprod6ob115.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP
ID DSNKTxvXXJs+/6ghYjsS94SHnEuXl4DXjAl0@???;
Sun, 22 Jan 2012 01:31:09 PST
Received: by dadi14 with SMTP id i14so1833718dad.27
for <users@???>; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 01:31:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zanker.org; s=google;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:x-gm-message-state:content-type;
bh=791MiAIyUEp/ps38zg+ETA+GoSGR1STib0R42/aS1D8=;
b=gWXlHmve2in50Kl9ksOWZj5nG/Jktlz9nRKKsIv7Uj/Yv/MXXvZBoYERHNu5Up1gSh
Td1GVIiX7oH3iJA9VKoaPa1Vc/PJsrTzg3S90a0r9lHCDCkCtz6unZE4BTqVzX3oMnWN
QI+I0yIbeeIHH5337tTT9bFbdENBIhWClInjA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.197.163 with SMTP id iv3mr11746325pbc.126.1327224667955;
Sun, 22 Jan 2012 01:31:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.1.5 with HTTP; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 01:31:07 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20120122090907.GW23380@???>
References: <20120122070717.GU23380@???>
<CAOGWvnHDqQvscgO9hrtf7V5uhGHL0ix8gGPmT3y38tW2=pQK7w@???>
<20120122090907.GW23380@???>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 09:31:07 +0000
Message-ID: <CAOGWvnGoMghO7Oxd35OOhb4Ma1C6o5AH=-F3zRQi935WC_JtNg@???>
From: Mike Zanker <mike@???>
To: users@???
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlcDUVbCkk7m0JYRILrw3H6tzU4G4G+2EeBJE6DMATTIzDvUIqhR8ulQNb171j521KtWanx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Sun,
22 Jan 2012 09:31:10 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 64.18.1.35
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mike@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd1.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN: AS26910 64.18.1.0/24
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
DKIM_VALID_AU, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
* medium trust * [64.18.1.35 listed in list.dnswl.org]
* -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's
