ts.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 08:09:25 -0000
--96icqjDFsSi85SgI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Michael,
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 02:04:31AM -0600, Michael Corliss wrote:
> I renumbered my Ubuntu VPS at the end of december, I had thought
> successfully, until this week I got an email letting me know that my
> website was still using the old IP address.
Do note that those emails are sent based on packet counts and it is
possible that just random Internet noise triggered it.
> nslookup confirms that the site is still using the old IP address.
First, can you let us know what the host name of the site is?
Cheers,
Andy
--=20
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
--96icqjDFsSi85SgI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREDAAYFAk8bxDQACgkQIJm2TL8VSQsJfgCg+cYZ+DiI8uktaKzDjsj9tHk6
9gUAn2vXFCHD4rRrKmvzndAyPTbAe4Zg
=6eUf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--96icqjDFsSi85SgI--
From michaeljcorliss@??? Sun Jan 22 08:24:12 2012
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f48.google.com ([209.85.215.48])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <michaeljcorliss@???>)
id 1Rosih-00015O-Hj
for users@???; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 08:24:12 +0000
Received: by lahl5 with SMTP id l5so1625679lah.21
for <users@???>; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:24:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=Zzlt2h5T1E7lNs+0tquaNSuw6Fb2+wFohQmyi3X/U9A=;
b=uH2ghOVX9eR0Kj//vleWX8JFF4gG7ZnxXpCm59ENSOrjo84rSOtnLMUf+7PNB5vg+Y
UA6/7k7UVztpR3jxHWr7KGdeQHLksjEDZkwEVYGiktU4ZPMVkmnXuJTorTLxFzHA3MXb
foYfQRpSOvKE8cP22YZVERAGfv7bUioEMvJ10=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.84.201 with SMTP id b9mr992022lbz.83.1327220644647; Sun,
22 Jan 2012 00:24:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.91.175 with HTTP; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:24:04 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20120122080925.GV23380@???>
References: <CACGFHYC0Zh-LdGWxXHJ+UXprLF3OeWoduGwGRr3q0RtgRuwDtw@???>
<20120122080925.GV23380@???>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 02:24:04 -0600
Message-ID: <CACGFHYDHWPP1WHXH+Q9_nWGfLmBXMefA+x5ebzRuQcmpVVi+sw@???>
From: Michael Corliss <michaeljcorliss@???>
To: Andy Smith <andy@???>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04016a0b10142004b719a3e3
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Sun,
22 Jan 2012 08:24:11 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.215.48
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: michaeljcorliss@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
low * trust * [209.85.215.48 listed in list.dnswl.org]
* -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
* 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's * domain
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signatu
