itfolk.com>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20120122080925.GV23380@???>
References: <CACGFHYC0Zh-LdGWxXHJ+UXprLF3OeWoduGwGRr3q0RtgRuwDtw@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="96icqjDFsSi85SgI"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CACGFHYC0Zh-LdGWxXHJ+UXprLF3OeWoduGwGRr3q0RtgRuwDtw@???>
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Sun,
22 Jan 2012 08:09:25 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andy@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd2.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RELAYS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Renumbering IPs and Bind
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 08:09:25 -0000
--96icqjDFsSi85SgI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Michael,
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 02:04:31AM -0600, Michael Corliss wrote:
> I renumbered my Ubuntu VPS at the end of december, I had thought
> successfully, until this week I got an email letting me know that my
> website was still using the old IP address.
Do note that those emails are sent based on packet counts and it is
possible that just random Internet noise triggered it.
> nslookup confirms that the site is still using the old IP address.
First, can you let us know what the host name of the site is?
Cheers,
Andy
--=20
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
--96icqjDFsSi85SgI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREDAAYFAk8bxDQACgkQIJm2TL8VSQsJfgCg+cYZ+DiI8uktaKzDjsj9tHk6
9gUAn2vXFCHD4rRrKmvzndAyPTbAe4Zg
=6eUf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--96icqjDFsSi85SgI--
From michaeljcorliss@??? Sun Jan 22 08:24:12 2012
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f48.google.com ([209.85.215.48])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <michaeljcorliss@???>)
id 1Rosih-00015O-Hj
for users@???; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 08:24:12 +0000
Received: by lahl5 with SMTP id l5so1625679lah.
