I didn't compile the tool, even though it looks useful.

On Wed, 20 Nov 2024, at 3:06 PM, Alain D D Williams via BitFolk Users wrote:

Could probably just type "rustup" to get a newer rust dev environment installed just for your user. Even that might say it is too old and urge you to get a newer one from <https://rustup.rs/> though.

Luckily it does compile down to a 7MiB binary. Of course even that is bigfor what it is, but such is the way with static Rust and Go binaries.

Is there any downside to distributing stripped binaries? (Assuming someone wanting to do debugging would build it themselves in a debug build.)

Hi Conrad, On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 02:49:18PM +0000, Conrad Wood via BitFolk Users wrote: Sure. Even gnome-terminal has supported emoji for years and years. It can still be a bit ropey with combining ones. Does your terminal not display things like 🔥 🏆 ✨ ? You would need an emoji font on your system though. I use $ apt show fonts-noto-color-emoji Package: fonts-noto-color-emoji Version: 2.042-0+deb12u1 Priority: optional Section: fonts Maintainer: Debian Fonts Task Force &lt;pkg-fonts-devel(a)lists.alioth.debian.org&gt; Installed-Size: 11.0 MB Homepage: https://www.google.com/get/noto/help/emoji/ Download-Size: 9,894 kB APT-Manual-Installed: yes APT-Sources: http://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm/main amd64 Packages Description: color emoji font from Google  Noto is a collection of font families, each visually harmonized across  scripts.  .  The name "Noto" is short for "No Tofu", describing the aim of covering  all living Unicode scripts.  .  Tofu (豆腐) is Japanese jargon for unicode replacement character "�"  (U+FFFD) often displayed as replacement for unassigned or unknown  characters.  .  This package contains the color emoji font used on "stock" Android devices  such as the Google Pixel.  and I also have a nerdfont installed (CommitMono).  In hindsight I suspect not that many people have an emoji font  installed so those three things may appear as the broken unicode  tofu symbol.  Perhaps I should have stuck to glyphs included in a nerdfont?  Presumably a few more sysadmin types would have one of those.  Perhaps I should add an option to *not* use emojis?  I don't think I can automatically detect if the user has a font with  that glyph. I only had to guess the shortcodes. 😀     https://github.com/grifferz/ptrcheck-rs/blob/4c3dc75ede802d3191bdd32b5a6df7… They are the same as used on github so they are easy to guess, and then can be checked on a site like     https://emojipedia.org/woman-facepalming#emoji If I can copy from there and paste in my terminal (*I* can, for the ones I used), then it will work. Taking the example of :fire:     https://emojipedia.org/fire#technical It's codepoint U+1F525 so to echo it to any terminal this should work: $ echo -e '\U01f525' 🔥 (you have to pad to 6 or 8 hex digits) Thanks, Andy _______________________________________________ BitFolk Users mailing list &lt;users(a)mailman.bitfolk.com&gt; You're subscribed as &lt;cnw(a)conradwood.net&gt; Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.bitfolk.com/mailman/postorius/lists/users.mailman.bitfolk.com/ or send an email to &lt;users-leave(a)mailman.bitfolk.com&gt;

Hello, On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 03:29:37PM +0000, Conrad Wood via BitFolk Users wrote: Ah, thanks! I also have the fire as my bash prompt for when the previous exit code was non-zero. 😀

On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 03:50:38PM +0000, Andy Smith via BitFolk Users wrote:    At work, I have a cat face 🐱 for when I'm connected to the Test kubernetes cluster, and a Munch-like cat-scream 🙀 for when I'm on the♨️ Live cluster. (I used to have them coloured as well, but I can't seem to persuade it to get the width of the prompt right any more, because it counts the ANSI codes as non-zero width).    I also know people who use 🐄 as the prefix for their btrfs subvolumes (instead of the more traditional "@"). :)    Hugo

I'm probably doing this wrong, but:

$ ./ptrcheck --server 85.119.80.222:53 --zone carfax.org.uk Error: 0: AXFR returned no answers: DnsResponse { message: Message { header: Header { id: 47788, message_type: Response, op_code: Query, authoritative: false, truncation: false, recursion_desired: true, recursion_available: false, authentic_data: false, checking_disabled: false, response_code: Refused, query_count: 1, answer_count: 0, name_server_count: 0, additional_count: 1 }, queries: [Query { name: Name("carfax.org.uk."), query_type: AXFR, query_class: IN }], answers: [], name_servers: [], additionals: [], signature: [], edns: Some(Edns { rcode_high: 0, version: 0, dnssec_ok: false, max_payload: 1232, options: OPT { options: {} } }) }, buffer: [186, 172, 129, 5, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 6, 99, 97, 114, 102, 97, 120, 3, 111, 114, 103, 2, 117, 107, 0, 0, 252, 0, 1, 0, 0, 41, 4, 208, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] }

What should I be doing here?

On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 06:24:03PM +0000, Andy Smith via BitFolk Users wrote: $ target/debug/ptrcheck -s 85.119.80.222:53 -z bitfolk.com; echo $? DNS server at 85.119.80.222:53 refused our AXFR 2 Better?

I finally got round to trying this out, but I'm obviously doing something wrong: ./ptrcheck -v --server 127.0.0.1 --zone caboose.org.uk Connecting to 127.0.0.1 port 53 for AXFR of zone caboose.org.uk Zone contains 1 record Found 0 unique address (A/AAAA) records

I finally got round to trying this out, but I'm obviously doing something wrong: ./ptrcheck -v --server 127.0.0.1 --zone caboose.org.uk Connecting to 127.0.0.1 port 53 for AXFR of zone caboose.org.uk Zone contains 1 record Found 0 unique address (A/AAAA) records