20 Feb
2019
20 Feb
'19
3:59 p.m.
** john lewis <zen57162(a)zen.co.uk> [2019-02-20 15:38]:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:25:44 +0000
Andy Smith <andy(a)bitfolk.com> wrote:
** end quote [john lewis]
Well I was using Debian until their policy caused me too much hassle
getting Linux installed on some hardware. It was easier to try Ubuntu
(given I had a handy CD) than try to rebuild the install CD with the
necessary drivers. Then a combination brand recognition for non Linux
customers and the regular release cycle / LTS resulted in gradually
standardising. That's about 13 years ago now - wow!
Of course, given the similarity of the infrastructure software used this
could be an issue for the Debain repositories too :-)
Hi John, btw. I was chatting Hants LUG at the PLUG meet last weekend
with someone who came along to some or the early meets. Took me back a
bit!
--
Paul Tansom | Aptanet Ltd. | https://www.aptanet.com/ | 023 9238 0001
Vice Chair, FSB Portsmouth & SE Hampshire Branch | http://www.fsb.org.uk/
=============================================================================
Registered in England | Company No: 4905028 | Registered Office: Ralls House,
Parklands Business Park, Forrest Road, Denmead, Waterlooville, Hants, PO7 6XP
In the mean time if it is causing you a problem
with your
do-release-upgrade my best suggestion is to remove the first
"apt-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com/ubuntu/" out of every URL in your
/etc/apt/sources.list, "sudo apt update" and try again.
Cheers,
Andy
Better still use Debian (like most of Hants LUG did till that upstart
U????? came along)