27 Mar
2013
27 Mar
'13
8:32 p.m.
Andy,
I have thought about setting up something like this for a while, but there
are always more things to do than time to do them. If you provide test
servers I would switch to using them. The idea of test servers to begin
with as there are sure to be hiccups of some sort somewhere along the line
and who knows how many broken DNSSEC servers up the line I have been
accepting DNS data from. So yes, a very useful addition which I would use
On 27 March 2013 20:24, Andy Smith <andy(a)bitfolk.com> wrote:
Hi Keith,
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 08:18:39PM +0000, Keith Williams wrote:
--
Keith Williams
Keith's Place www.keiths-place.co.uk
Tailor Made English www.tmenglish.org
West Norfolk RSPCA www.westnorfolkrspca.org.uk
I'm happy to go with the change and with the
logging of fails and if a
test
resolver were set up, I'd change over to that
Is a test resolver something that you require and will use?
If no one's bothered, I don't want to do it. Personally I am happy
for it just to happen.
Cheers,
Andy
--
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREDAAYFAlFTVWkACgkQIJm2TL8VSQvvmQCg7IdSe6Ke4vtqpm6mhXAwzHrK
JzoAoLXkky1OQb07QZfThhXPOLOJWy2a
=/2zW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)lists.bitfolk.com
https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users