On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 02:43:47PM +0000, Andy Smith wrote:
Hello,
As you may be aware, BitFolk currently doesn't support 64-bit
guests. The reasons for this are:
- 64-bit is alleged to be a little slower and use more memory
per-process compared to 32-bit.
- 99.04% of BitFolk customers have less than 2GiB addressable RAM.
- Supporting only 32-bit or only 64-bit is a bit simpler.
We do, however occasionally lose custom due to not supporting 64-bit
guests.
A future memory upgrade (not planned as to when) will obviously push
more people into the space where >2G RAM per process would be
beneficial, so I will consider switching to only 64-bit by that
time. Will anyone be terribly upset to leave 32-bit behind?
To clarify I am saying that after that point new installs would have
to be 64-bit. Existing 32-bit installs would be unaffected.
Also if you have a requirement for 64-bit it would be appreciated if
you could vote for:
https://tools.bitfolk.com/redmine/issues/27
I've encountered an interesting reason for 64bit recently - apparently
go (
http://golang.org/) has problems with long running 32 bit server
processes that go away on 64bit.
Not that I have any code that actually qualifies.
Michael