28 Mar
2022
28 Mar
'22
4:01 p.m.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 04:55:05PM +0100, Andy Bennett wrote:
Hi,
Yes:
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
envelope-from domain
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
Hugo.
--
Hugo Mills | "I am the author. You are the audience. I outrank
hugo@... carfax.org.uk | you!"
http://carfax.org.uk/ | Franz Liebkind
PGP: E2AB1DE4 | The Producers
I've just had a brief interchange with a
small charity that uses
DigitalOcean for some of their systems. A password-change mail from
their website was binned by my exim instance, for a score of 8.8 given
to it by the Bitfolk SpamAssassin (5.0 of that for coming from Digital
Ocean).
Can anyone suggest how, if at all, I can whitelist mail from that
particular domain in my (Debian) exim4 config, given that I'm using
the Bitfolk SpamAssassin and therefore have no control over it?
Do they sign their mail with DKIM?