Re: [bitfolk] Ubuntu EOL dates - which to quote in general documentation?

Hi Andy, My question would be - what is your aim in putting the EOL date on that page? You're not (presumably) implying any level of support at bitfolk with regards to those dates? Or perhaps you should be - if I want to pay for Ubuntu extended support, I'd hope you wouldn't make changes that would prevent me running ye olde Ubuntu at bitfolk. I think it's easy to assume that Debian is in a better position than Ubuntu because it supports the whole archive, but in practice surely it is still driven by the maintainer to some degree and hence can vary from package to package. For popular packages I'm sure things will get fixed, but for smaller, less well known packages I just think issues are more likely to pass them by. Regards, Roger