Re: [bitfolk] Remote syslog?

On 14 March 2010 10:36, Andy Smith <andy(a)bitfolk.com> wrote: I tried Splunk, though IIUC it runs locally. It's just a bunch of python scripts. It also uses Flash all over the place so the Web app feels clunky and of course would never be useful from a mobile Web browser. So I went off and tried https://landscape.canonical.com/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/hendry/4428825253/ However the Landscape service also does not collate logs and I wrote to Canonical asking why. They replied: """ We currently don't capture any logs by default. The reason for this is simply data volume: we would use a lot of bandwidth collecting the logs that would be interesting to a lot of people and, for the most part, that would end up being a waste of resources. Instead, we recommend you use script execution to fetch logs from one or more computers at a time when you need to view them.""" I can't help but wonder, what the future for logging holds. Right now it's a pretty shoddy state of affairs.