Jan Henkins wrote:
[snip]
I recently bought something through the Linux
Emporium, and they use
Protx. It's a bit invasive (in terms of "verbosity") in the buying
process, but it works well. You might be able to get some info from them.
Talk of the devil. I originally founded The Linux Emporium and was
responsible for the use of Protx as an intermediary.
When I started doing mail order the credit card companies were almost
totally ignorant of the web. Getting the right to do
customer-not-present transactions was a bit of a nightmare, but they
weren't the least bit interested in how I collected the orders from my
customers - phone, fax, letter, web - it was all the same to them. For
several years we simply used a credit card terminal as you would find in
any retail outlet. The credit card companies insist on you (the
business) taking all the risk in customer-not-present transactions, but
I'm happy to say that we had not a single charge-back in that period. I
think it had something to do with the fact that every order was reviewed
by a person before processing.
Later on the CC companies cottoned on to the 'net and brought in new
regulations which required all orders placed via a web site to be
processed in a different way. At this point I switched to using an
electronic shopping cart and Protx as an intermediary.
One odd problem arose at this point. Because it was possible to place
very small orders through our system (as small as £1.50) it seemed to
attract card fraudsters in the far east who would use it as a means to
vet stolen credit card details. They'd type in a totally gibberish
address and details and then use one credit card after another until
they found one which was accepted. I presume they then went off to use
it for a serious transaction somewhere else. I tried to flag it to the
CC companies (since it was their new requirements which had opened up
this hole) but I never managed to get past their front desk people who,
not understanding the issue, assumed it wasn't one.
I changed our settings at Protx so that when a customer placed an order
the transaction was simply approved with the companies but the money
wasn't actually debited. Then we did the old-fashioned manual review
before actually letting it go through.
It was over 5 years ago that I sold TLE, but I found Protx's systems a
bit odd. They may have improved by now. They didn't seem to have much
idea about how to produce meaningful reports, so reconciling each day's
transactions was a nightmare. (Particularly compared to the old system
with the CC terminal which simply printed a total at the end of the day
which could be compared to the orders book total.)
Speaking for myself, I really do not mind the
Paypal/Google or direct
transfer methods as things currently stands, and I am quite sure that most
Bitfolkers would echo this feeling. Why change?
I would not use any system involving Paypal - too many bad experiences.
I'm more than happy with direct bank transfer. If you're only making a
payment once a year then where's the problem?
Cheers,
John