31 Dec
2013
31 Dec
'13
1:19 p.m.
Aah! Didn't know that. But now when you say so, it makes sense. Have
no real experience with IPv6, so I thought it might be translated to
IP v4 addresses for some reason (and that causing the confusion for
fail2ban).
Thanks!
__
/ony
-------
Tuesday, December 31, 2013, 11:47:30 AM, Mathew wrote:
Hi Tony,
On Tue, December 31, 2013 12:18 am, Tony Andersson
wrote:
> Realised the second after I pressed the send
button that the answer to
> the ban issue is because those attacks are on ip v6
[...]
> tcp6 0 1 85.119.82.79:80
121.168.45.218:1446
They are actually IPv4 connections, as indicated by
the address
structure/format. The 'tcp6' label is just how netstat illustrates a
service listening on both IPv4 and IPv6.
Mathew
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)lists.bitfolk.com
https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users