28 Jan
2010
28 Jan
'10
7:04 a.m.
Although it is my opinion that 2 is probably the technically more
clever and useful option - you will probably find allowing an
alternative email (i.e. if there mail is hosted on bitfolk) to save
more agro.
On 27 January 2010 21:24, Robert Leverington <robert(a)rhl.me.uk> wrote:
On 2010-01-27, Andy Smith wrote:
Strictly speaking the above set of failures are
going to be mostly
in customer hands so there is an argument that I need do nothing
more, however, two workarounds spring to mind.
One is allowing people to configure multiple email addresses
(perhaps multiple roles, each with one or more addresses). Another
is to implement management of console SSH keys into the console and
web panel, so that people have an easier time getting in.
Which would you prefer I tackled first?
Personally I would prefer the latter as it has utility beyond simply
rescuing inaccessible accounts.
Robert
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)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=BKUk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)lists.bitfolk.com
https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users