On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 09:31:49AM +0000, ed wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 10:25:54AM +0100, Hugo Mills wrote:
> > Gaah. Ignore me. It was late, and I've been spending a lot of time
> > on the btrfs mailing list recently. This looks just like the sort of
> > problem people get on there...
>
> How do you rate btrfs compared with zfs, if you've got experience with
> the two that is...
I've not used ZFS, so I can't compare the two directly. However,
btrfs is currently less mature: we recommend having good backups
regardless of your filesystem, but we suggest that you be prepared to
use them if you're running btrfs.
That said, the latest version is pretty stable in normal use. It
supports RAID-0, -1 and -10 independently for each of data and
metadata, has independently-moutable subvolumes and copy-on-write
snapshots, and supports online resize and disk insertion and removal.
It's fully checksummed, so if it encounters corrupt data it can tell
you, *and* attempt to go and read from the other copy in your RAID-1
(or -10) array -- MD RAID-1 won't do this for you, because it doesn't
have the checksums, so it can't tell which copy is good. There's a
mode for supporting SSDs.
What's not there yet, but planned: a working fsck(*),
deduplication, a cross-filesystem replication tool like ZFS's
send/receive, RAID-5/6 (in .41, probably), hierarchical storage,
per-subvolume RAID options, changing RAID levels, encryption.
Hugo.
(*) Rumour has it that we'll get the first cut of this at the end of
the month. But we've all heard that one before.
--
=== Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk ===
PGP key: 515C238D from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk
--- Is a diversity twice as good as a university? ---
Hi,
It came to my attention yesterday that some customers were finding
our install of Cacti [1] confusing. The main problem appeared to be
that the default view upon logging in was the "Tree View", and it
wasn't obvious how to get from there to the individual graphs that
you're permitted to view.
Experienced Cacti users will know that the three buttons in the top
right corner switch between the three different graph views: "Tree",
"List" and "Preview".
The "Tree View" is what you were all seeing to begin with. "List
View" is just a textual list of links to all graphs that you're
permitted to view. "Preview View" is similar, but provides graph
thumbnails to click on.
Of these, it was suggested that "Preview View" was the most obvious,
so I have now set everyone's default view to be this. It should take
effect from your next login to Cacti.
I didn't spot anyone who had deliberately set their default view to
"Tree" or "List", but if you did, or if you just happen to prefer
the other views, you can set them as your personal default from the
"settings" tab.
If you have any problems, do let me know.
Cheers,
Andy
[1] https://tools.bitfolk.com/cacti/
--
<zts> well it turns out that there was a miscommunication: one team
thought we were meant to be hanging ourselves; the other, that
immolation was the way forward. And so we kinda accidentally
burnt our rope.
_______________________________________________
announce mailing list
announce(a)lists.bitfolk.com
https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/announce
Hi
I was just wondering, as sometimes i find free ram swings from very little,
to quite alot.
Is there a way, to work out what is using ram, and how much. to see what is
sucking ram?
Thank you
PMT
Hi,
We've now tested and made available:
- Debian wheezy (testing)
- Ubuntu Natty Narwhal (11.04)
for self-install:
https://tools.bitfolk.com/wiki/Using_the_self-serve_net_installer
If trying out Debian wheezy please do bear in mind that as the
current testing distribution it is still under development and may
thus be broken and/or uninstallable at any particular time. Whilst
we will most likely be unable to help, we'd still like to hear of
any problems you have using or installing wheezy.
Those considering an upgrade from Ubuntu Lucid Lynx (10.04.x LTS) to
Maverick Meerkat (10.10) or Natty Narwhal (11.04) should remember
that vendor security support for these latter two releases ends in
April/October 2012 respectively. If you don't intend to upgrade your
OS before then, you may wish to remain on the LTS release which is
supported until April 2015.
Cheers,
Andy
--
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
_______________________________________________
announce mailing list
announce(a)lists.bitfolk.com
https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/announce