Re: [bitfolk] The forthcoming Debian 10.0 (buster) release

Top Page
Author: Andy Smith
Date:  
To: users
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] The forthcoming Debian 10.0 (buster) release

Reply to this message
gpg: Signature made Sat Jul 6 18:10:05 2019 UTC
gpg: using DSA key 2099B64CBF15490B
gpg: Good signature from "Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andrew James Smith <andy@strugglers.net>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (UKUUG) <andy.smith@ukuug.org>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (BitFolk Ltd.) <andy@bitfolk.com>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (Linux User Groups UK) <andy@lug.org.uk>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (Cernio Technology Cooperative) <andy.smith@cernio.com>" [unknown]
Hi Keith,

On Sat, Jul 06, 2019 at 12:38:22PM +0100, Keith Williams wrote:
> This is of course too unwieldy to actually use so I followed through the
> instructions for changing it to say eth0 to save editing all the /etc files
> which explicitly name the interface.
> None of the files seem to exist. Is this because it is all under the
> control of Xen rather than the virtual machine? i.e. can I stop worrying?


On the new install that I did, the network interfaces were not
renamed, i.e. they went eth0, eth1, etc. I suspect that udev either
knows not to rename Xen ones, or else it doesn't know anything about
Xen ones so doesn't. Either way I don't think you need to do
anything and the interfaces will stay as eth0.

I think that's probably the best way to keep it as the index of your
network interface is decided on bitfolk's side.

Cheers,
Andy

--
https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting