On 09/04/2019 10:59, Keith Williams wrote:
>
> On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 17:38, Dom Latter <bitfolk-users@???
> <mailto:bitfolk-users@latter.org>> wrote:
>
> On 09/04/2019 04:44, Keith Williams wrote:
> > for at least 24 hours now. They go for ports 22.23.53, 80, 443
> and 7777.
> > That last one is particularly nasty.
>
> They're (probably) looking for a backdoor opened up by Windows malware.
>
> Why would that concern you?
> It does concern me for a number of reasons.
I was particularly referencing 7777 (hence the quoted context). You've
not got anything on that port, and even if you did, it wouldn't be
compatible.
I don't think I'd even notice an attempt to connect to 7777.
Because a connection is not made...
