Re: [bitfolk] gmail thinks/thought all bitfolk support email…

Top Page
Author: Peter Collins
Date:  
To: users
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] gmail thinks/thought all bitfolk support email is/was spam

Reply to this message
Test from gmail controlled domain using soft fail

On 12 November 2015 at 19:56, Mike Zanker <mike@???> wrote:

>
gpg: invalid clearsig header
gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
gpg: block_filter: 1st length byte missing
gpg: cleartext signature without data
gpg: no signature found
gpg: the signature could not be verified.
Please remember that the signature file (.sig or .asc)
should be the first file given on the command line.
> On 12/11/2015 19:49, Andy Smith wrote:
>
> > gmail is fun, isn't it? Welcome to my world, only it is with
> > people I need to pay me. :)
>
> I suspect that it failed SPF because it went via the mail list. DKIM
> should be OK but I'm also using DMARC so it will have 'failed' overall.
>
> Mike
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users@???
> https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users
>