Re: [bitfolk] Scanning for "heartbleed" vulnerability

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Ian
Date:  
To: users
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Scanning for "heartbleed" vulnerability
Andy said:

>> What about Webmin (10000) and Usermin(20000)?
>
> Thanks, I'll give them a try.


Did you do a test between 2am and now?

Gavin's post prompted me to have a look... and until this morning, the
miniserv process used by webmin was still using the old library (or at
least that's what

lsof -n | grep ssl | grep DEL

thought!)

The other things that were also doing so were fail2ban and opendkim, but
neither of those should have been visible from outside the VPS.

Ian