Re: [bitfolk] Scanning for "heartbleed" vulnerability

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
M--+\the complete thread tree sorted by date
M..MMAndy Smith at <-
M+\MMAlun at ->
Author: Misha Gale
Date:  
To: users
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Scanning for "heartbleed" vulnerability

Reply to this message
gpg: Signature made Fri Apr 11 18:57:07 2014 UTC
gpg: using RSA key E99E8EEE1986B8E1
gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
On 11/04/2014 19:54, Andy Smith wrote:
> At the moment we are only checking ports: 25, 443, 465, 587, 993,
> 995, 8443. Can you think of any others that are likely to have SSL
> services on?

Presumably HTTP proxy servers can run SSL, so maybe add 8080 and 3128 to
that list?

--
Misha Gale
PGP Public Key: 0x6F109D93 http://mishagale.co.uk/pubkey.asc

This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
users
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [bitfolk] Scanning for "heartbleed" vulnerabilityRe: [bitfolk] Scanning for "heartbleed" vulnerability->
Bitfolk Mailing List Archive administrated by List AdminLurker (version 2.3)