Re: [bitfolk] Scanning for "heartbleed" vulnerability

Top Page
Author: Misha Gale
Date:  
To: users
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Scanning for "heartbleed" vulnerability

Reply to this message
gpg: Signature made Fri Apr 11 18:57:07 2014 UTC
gpg: using RSA key E99E8EEE1986B8E1
gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
On 11/04/2014 19:54, Andy Smith wrote:
> At the moment we are only checking ports: 25, 443, 465, 587, 993,
> 995, 8443. Can you think of any others that are likely to have SSL
> services on?


Presumably HTTP proxy servers can run SSL, so maybe add 8080 and 3128 to
that list?

--
Misha Gale
PGP Public Key: 0x6F109D93 http://mishagale.co.uk/pubkey.asc