gpg: Signature made Mon Oct 21 16:22:39 2013 UTC
gpg: using DSA key 2099B64CBF15490B
gpg: Good signature from "Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andrew James Smith <andy@strugglers.net>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (UKUUG) <andy.smith@ukuug.org>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (BitFolk Ltd.) <andy@bitfolk.com>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (Linux User Groups UK) <andy@lug.org.uk>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (Cernio Technology Cooperative) <andy.smith@cernio.com>" [unknown]
Hi Adam,
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 03:37:25PM +0100, Adam Spiers wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 10:50:14AM +0000, Andy Smith wrote:
> > But to have something like:
> >
> > Allow us to take:
> >
> > - full payment
> > - $cost + 500%
> > - $cost + 100%
> > - $cost + 50%
> > - $cost
> >
> > $per period by DD
> >
> > seems like it is getting a bit complicated from a user interface
> > point of view, and means that it will need spelling out why exactly
> > we might want to take more, still doesn't prevent needing to cancel
> > and re-auth if they upgrade a lot, and just feels like generally
> > forcing people to think about things they probably never wanted to
> > think about.
>
> I agree that's too complicated. But I also don't understand what
> advantage anything like that would bring.
Well, you did say that you'd like it limited to £100/month, but
other people may want other limits, so how do I know?
What if we just started with a limit of 10x the amount and in the
unlikely event that people ordered more than that then they would
have to cancel it and re-authorize?
Cheers,
Andy
--
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
