Re: [bitfolk] BitFolk's DNS resolvers and DNSSEC validation …

Top Page
Author: Andy Smith
Date:  
To: users
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] BitFolk's DNS resolvers and DNSSEC validation - how to make progress?

Reply to this message
gpg: Signature made Wed Mar 27 22:04:57 2013 UTC
gpg: using DSA key 2099B64CBF15490B
gpg: Good signature from "Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andrew James Smith <andy@strugglers.net>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (UKUUG) <andy.smith@ukuug.org>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (BitFolk Ltd.) <andy@bitfolk.com>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (Linux User Groups UK) <andy@lug.org.uk>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (Cernio Technology Cooperative) <andy.smith@cernio.com>" [unknown]
Hello,

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:07:06PM +0000, Andy Smith wrote:
> We could put up a test instance of Unbound with validation enabled
> and you could switch to using it, to see if anything breaks. Is that
> something that any of you think you would bother with?


It looks like it will be quicker to just do this than to extract a
firm desire for it out of anyone. :)

So, there's now a validating resolver on 85.119.80.243. It will
return SERVFAIL for domains with broken DNSSEC. If you want to test
DNSSEC without installing your own resolver, please use that IP (and
only that IP) in your /etc/resolv.conf, or you can issue "dig"
commands like:

    $ dig -t a www.dnssec-failed.org @85.119.80.243


    ; <<>> DiG 9.7.3 <<>> -t a www.dnssec-failed.org @85.119.80.243
    ;; global options: +cmd
    ;; Got answer:
    ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 12471
    ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0


    ;; QUESTION SECTION:
    ;www.dnssec-failed.org.         IN      A


    ;; Query time: 1287 msec
    ;; SERVER: 85.119.80.243#53(85.119.80.243)
    ;; WHEN: Wed Mar 27 21:50:46 2013
    ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 39


In a couple of days I will send an email to announce@ stating when
validation will be turned on for the production resolvers and
mentioning the existence of 85.119.80.243.

I have since discovered "val-permissive-mode: yes":

    http://unbound.net/documentation/howto_turnoff_dnssec.html


so what will most likely happen is that validation will be enabled
in permissive mode right away and logs examined after a week to see
what the likely fallout will be.

Cheers,
Andy

--
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting