[bitfolk] Routing issues

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Matthew Daubney
Date:  
Subject: [bitfolk] Routing issues
dents postings
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 09:08:51 -0000


Duggie <duggie@???> wrote:

>Hi Andy,
>
>I'd welcome this level of alerting, to the users@ list.


As would I.

--
OM


From mstevens@??? Fri Dec 07 09:49:45 2012
Received: from ceres.etla.org ([2001:ba8:1f1:f1ef::2])
    by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
    (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mstevens@???>)
    id 1TguYy-0002Ek-Rz; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 09:49:44 +0000
Received: from mstevens by ceres.etla.org with local (Exim 4.72)
    (envelope-from <mstevens@???>)
    id 1TguYw-0001bw-M1; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 09:49:42 +0000
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 09:49:42 +0000
From: Michael Stevens <mstevens@???>
To: Andy Smith <andy@???>
Message-ID: <20121207094942.GA3300@???>
References: <20121207021942.GT3867@???>
    <20121207085116.GU3867@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
    protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20121207085116.GU3867@???>
X-Phase-Of-Moon: The Moon is Waning Crescent (42% of Full)
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Fri,
    07 Dec 2012 09:49:44 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:ba8:1f1:f1ef::2
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mstevens@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
    spamd1.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT
    shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT Not all rules were run,
    due to a shortcircuited rule
    * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Cc: users@???
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Proposal: Security incidents postings
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 09:49:45 -0000



--7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 08:51:17AM +0000, Andy Smith wrote:
> There'll probably be a couple more that I was unable to find, but
> that's the gist of it.


Hi.

I got hit by a dictionary attack on SMTP AUTH (well it looked like that
was how they got the login) that was then used to send out spam.
Thankful