Re: [bitfolk] iptables front-end?

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Daniel Néri
Date:  
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] iptables front-end?
ul\@stimpsonfamily.co.uk" <paul@???>
References: <88828840.317833.1354535110887.JavaMail.open-xchange@???>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 13:57:17 +0100
In-Reply-To: <88828840.317833.1354535110887.JavaMail.open-xchange@???>
    (paul@???'s message of "Mon, 3 Dec 2012 11:45:10
    +0000 (GMT)")
Message-ID: <87pq2rl2du.fsf@???>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Mon,
    03 Dec 2012 12:57:27 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.214.48
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tealeg@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
    spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
    DKIM_VALID_AU, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
    SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
    * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
    low *      trust *      [209.85.214.48 listed in list.dnswl.org]
    * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
    author's *       domain
    * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
    *  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
    *      valid
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Cc: "users@???" <users@???>
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] [Slightly O/T] Xen machine hanging on reboot
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:57:28 -0000



Paul,

I'm not a Xen expert, so I can't really help with the question itself,
but why not try asking in the Ubuntu community (try askubuntu.com or the
ubuntu forums, there are plenty of Xen people there).

--
Geoffrey Teale
tealeg@???
geoffrey.teale@???


From jedi58@??? Mon Dec 03 13:45:47 2012
Received: from mail-lb0-f176.google.com ([209.85.217.176])
    by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
    (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jedi58@???>) id 1TfWLC-0004Y7-I1
    for users@???; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 13:45:47 +0000
Received: by mail-lb0-f176.google.com with SMTP id k6so2833408lbo.21
    for <users@???>; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 05:45:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
    h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
    :cc:content-type;
    bh=OhTeDlo/xcwMQRNzM24WUlITT7VAnw58rRugYJET0DU=;
    b=imE3uEMWizmf7l7AbuvSAa8j74EVPTR6RwErcKTyD0PWx845YvtsMnysW4+17fDJ+Z
    VNue46Vdc2RiK96EwYJ/12/TY5SHX2pdV4DCgDMlS3V+QJw9gB3oplLvNiSK/lQ9a/va
    cWBypBrvdyZPZH8wYM9v0X7s9q9KWmh3andHVNhPhGx7PAb3XK9huwyV4Nmy+Hu9esiU
    YlDzRPK9wKOUidnm4d/lO58SAinwwEIi9/lfGPGFmFVYw6A0aS5hqySBmQs8uPi2y761
    89jO6lDp5XxTt/nfuDECbu/HCmKoME47VyOMRONFlnO78RjPZshkHHIZA9Eh1Rz37Bdh
    zSIQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.50.205 with SMTP id e13mr4340529lbo.57.1354542340467; Mon,
    03 Dec 2012 05:45:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.13.8 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 05:45:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <cb82395d0b71c1b0cc15c6a82ef22cad@???>
References: <CAJ-QA9YgboSxXo+0FGQnzxejb+n