Re: [bitfolk] Upgrading from Etch to Lenny

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Andy Bennett
Date:  
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Upgrading from Etch to Lenny
net. IN A

;; ANSWER SECTION:
pear.php.net.           265     IN      CNAME   euk1.php.net.
euk1.php.net.           265     IN      A       5.77.39.20


;; Query time: 11 msec
;; SERVER: 8.8.8.8#53(8.8.8.8)
;; WHEN: Mon Dec 3 12:21:43 2012
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 65
---end---

Interesting stuff. It seems that the two Bitfolk-supplied IP addresses
are down at the moment for whatever reason (probably worth asking Andy
what is going on via an email to support@???). For now I suggest
that you add the following line above the two other nameserver entries
in your file:

nameserver 8.8.8.8

That is a public resolver by Google, which seems to do a good enough
job at resolving odds and ends. Still, consider it a stop-gap for now
until you have sorted out what you need to know in order to install your
own local resolver (both bind and dnsmasq are excellent packages for
situations like this).


Regards,
Jan Henkins


From jedi58@??? Mon Dec 03 12:28:23 2012
Received: from mail-lb0-f176.google.com ([209.85.217.176])
    by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
    (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jedi58@???>) id 1TfV8I-0000jk-TZ
    for users@???; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:28:23 +0000
Received: by mail-lb0-f176.google.com with SMTP id k6so2746930lbo.21
    for <users@???>; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 04:28:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
    h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
    :cc:content-type;
    bh=jwlJ3fZ160AbZU52QW8U1yeEYg9QpkgusXzz7AyqDOo=;
    b=Xi2tqdpGFNcQwLwjxur8RW3vfec3h392rfP2XEOyJf6edK0j7n3ZyI/8KWZOZqjXb2
    WNnsrIrmkaUbG/EmoOzU0eMTshBH1rhFt7OrVbOZD910VNTA36hmpDs3hHWl17+C7Jsv
    LmISRnjOdq8MbEB3Y+sMTz5M+pn9+OtTfWICHBzh8VqcJ/FvDQgSCamfv6OR+yvVeZM5
    xWU+0RHFwhFUXbzOaGNLXL6idVLnJI/VTS6vEMQiXU32O8d98PW+JZIJRm9A9Lt5yz8N
    ut2G7/fKDadHQUjNZmZNQmFj/te5vvIZ/ahNH7YUBybhpjLmOoE5NsooCEzykljznyJC
    vhoA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.148.40 with SMTP id tp8mr9261259lab.30.1354537696856; Mon,
    03 Dec 2012 04:28:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.13.8 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 04:28:16 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <13e01ebd5d94ebb42cd587a0485b087e@???>
References: <CAJ-QA9YgboSxXo+0FGQnzxejb+nU8Mqqsj3vqToUWJ4sNa+akA@???>
    <a199d875c77843d230eb027ce0bc7c36@???>
    <CAJ-QA9bt8h5=MSWBdrhbkHiYvuKBJYrdWH7VGXMiWdcsWhZAsA@???>
    <f6aa5aab3f93aa5ca54307b4286f83ae@???>
    <CAJ-QA9b0eEsb0nDx2chAduyahMPPzE3Os88RHcGhMD6VKOco7Q@???>
    <13e01ebd5d94ebb42cd587a0485b087e@???>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 12:28:16 +0000
Message-ID: <CAJ-QA9YDbnA6iJySndgaoS4KQxUf1drQ-s0G6PY3uUou50UVeg@???>
From: David Paul <jedi58@???>
To: jan@???
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f234665418add04cff1e276
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Mon,
    03 Dec 2012 12:28:22 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.217.176
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jedi58@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
    spamd0.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
    DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no
    autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
    *  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
    * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
    author's *       domain
    * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
    *  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
    *      valid
    * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
    low *      trust
    *      [209.85.217.176 listed in list.dnswl.org]
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Cc: Bitfolk Users <users@???>
Subjec