policy ACCEPT)
> target =C2=A0 =C2=A0 prot opt source =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0=
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 destination
>
> Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
> target =C2=A0 =C2=A0 prot opt source =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0=
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 destination
This means you do not have *any* active iptables rules at all. I think=20
it's your resolver setup, so please have a look in your /etc/resolv.conf=20
file to see where your queries goes. Here is the content of one of mine:
---start---
# cat /etc/resolv.conf
search your.domain.name
nameserver 127.0.0.1
nameserver 85.119.80.232
nameserver 85.119.80.233
---end---
Regards,
Jan Henkins
From jan@??? Mon Dec 03 12:27:35 2012
Received: from [2001:ba8:1f1:f0ef:216:3eff:fe14:ae03]
(helo=heimdall.henkins.za.net)
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <jan@???>) id 1TfV7W-0000XE-U4
for users@???; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:27:35 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by heimdall.henkins.za.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B40244C30F;
Mon, 3 Dec 2012 12:27:34 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at heimdall.henkins.za.net
Received: from heimdall.henkins.za.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (heimdall.henkins.za.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
port 10024)
with ESMTP id rgbUe8KnlFDL; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 12:27:33 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from secure.henkins.net (balder.henkins.za.net [85.119.83.94])
by heimdall.henkins.za.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 737CF4C30E;
Mon, 3 Dec 2012 12:27:33 +0000 (GMT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:27:33 +0000
From: jan@???
To: David Paul <jedi58@???>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-QA9b0eEsb0nDx2chAduyahMPPzE3Os88RHcGhMD6VKOco7Q@???>
References: <CAJ-QA9YgboSxXo+0FGQnzxejb+nU8Mqqsj3vqToUWJ4sNa+akA@???>
<a199d875c77843d230eb027ce0bc7c36@???>
<CAJ-QA9bt8h5=MSWBdrhbkHiYvuKBJYrdWH7VGXMiWdcsWhZAsA@???>
<f6aa5aab3f93aa5ca54307b4286f83ae@???>
<CAJ-QA9b0eEsb0nDx2chAduyahMPPzE3Os88RHcGhMD6VKOco7Q@???>
Message-ID: <13e01ebd5d94ebb42cd587a0485b087e@???>
X-Sender: jan@???
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/RCMAIL_VERSION
X-bitfolk.com-Metrics-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for
2001:ba8:1f1:f0ef:216:3eff:fe14:ae03 (failed)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Mon,
03 Dec 2012 12:27:35 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:ba8:1f1:f0ef:216:3eff:fe14:ae03
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jan@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd1.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT
shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT Not all rules were run,
due to a shortcircuited rule
* -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Cc: Bitfolk Users <users@???>
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Can't ping pear.php.net
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:27:35 -0000
On 2012-12-03 12:07, David Paul wrote:
> I don't think I did, think it's as it was when I got the VPS
>
> search the-new-jedi-order.co.uk [1].
> nameserver 85.119.80.232
> nameserver 85.119.80.233
OK, so that looks similar to mine. I have done some dig tests:
---start---
~# dig @127.0.0.1 pear.php.net
; <<>> DiG 9.7.3 <<>> @127.0.0.1 pear.php.net
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 57104
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 4, ADDITIONAL: 6
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;pear.php.net. IN A
;; ANSWER SECTION:
pear.php.net. 300 IN CNAME euk1.php.net.
euk1.php.net. 300 IN A 5.77.39.20
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
php.net. 169942 IN NS dns3.easydns.org.
php.net. 169942 IN NS dns4.easydns.info.
php.net. 169942 IN NS dns2.easydns.net.
php.net. 169942 IN NS dns1.easydns.com.
;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
dns1.easydns.com. 300 IN A 64.68.192.210
dns1.easydns.com. 300 IN AAAA 2001:1838:f001::10
dns3.easydns.org. 600 IN A 64.68.195.10
dns3.easydns.org. 60 IN AAAA 2620:49:a::10
dns4.easydns.info. 40342 IN A 194.0.2.19
dns4.easydns.info. 40342 IN AAAA 2001:678:5::13
;; Query time: 350 msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1)
;; WHEN: Mon Dec 3 12:20:36 2012
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 315
~# dig @185.119.80.232 pear.php.net
; <<>> DiG 9.7.3 <<>> @185.119.80.232 pear.php.net
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
~# dig @185.119.80.233 pear.php.net
; <<>> DiG 9.7.3 <<>> @185.119.80.233 pear.php.net
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
~# dig @8.8.8.8 pear.php.net
; <<>> DiG 9.7.3 <<>> @8.8.8.8 pear.php.net
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 59519
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;pear.php.net. IN A
;; ANSWER SECTION:
pear.php.net. 265 IN CNAME euk1.php.net.
euk1.php.net. 265 IN A 5.77.39.20
;; Query time: 11 msec
;; SERVER: 8.8.8.8#53(8.8.8.8)
;; WHEN: Mon Dec 3 12:21:43 2012
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 65
---end---
Interesting stuff. It seems that the two Bitfolk-supplied IP addresses
are down at the moment for whatever reason (probably worth asking Andy
what is going on via an email to support@???). For now I suggest
that you add the following line above the two other nameserver entries
in your file:
nameserver 8.8.8.8
That is a public resolver by Google, which seems to do a good enough
job at resolving odds and ends. Still, consider it a stop-gap for now
until you have sorted out what you need to know in order to install your
own local resolver (both bind and dnsmasq are excellent packages for
situations like this).
Regards,
Jan Henkins
From jedi58@??? Mon Dec 03 12:28:23 2012
Received: from mail-lb0-f176.google.com ([209.85.217.176])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jedi58@???>) id 1TfV8I-0000jk-TZ
for users@???; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:28:23 +0000
Received: by mail-lb0-f176.google.com with SMTP id k6so2746930lbo.21
for <users@???>; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 04:28:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=jwlJ3fZ160AbZU52QW8U1yeEYg9QpkgusXzz7AyqDOo=;
b=Xi2tqdpGFNcQwLwjxur8RW3vfec3h392rfP2XEOyJf6edK0j7n3ZyI/8KWZOZqjXb2
WNnsrIrmkaUbG/EmoOzU0eMTshBH1rhFt7OrVbOZD910VNTA36hmpDs3hHWl17+C7Jsv
LmISRnjOdq8MbEB3Y+sMTz5M+pn9+OtTfWICHBzh8VqcJ/FvDQgSCamfv6OR+yvVeZM5
xWU+0RHFwhFUXbzOaGNLXL6idVLnJI/VTS6vEMQiXU32O8d98PW+JZIJRm9A9Lt5yz8N
ut2G7/fKDadHQUjNZmZNQmFj/te5vvIZ/ahNH7YUBybhpjLmOoE5NsooCEzykljznyJC
vhoA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.148.40 with SMTP id tp8mr9261259lab.30.1354537696856; Mon,
03 Dec 2012 04:28:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.13.8 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 04:28:16 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <13e01ebd5d94ebb42cd587a0485b087e@???>
References: <CAJ-QA9YgboSxXo+0FGQnzxejb+nU8Mqqsj3vqToUWJ4sNa+akA@???>
<a199d875c77843d230eb027ce0bc7c36@???>
<CAJ-QA9bt8h5=MSWBdrhbkHiYvuKBJYrdWH7VGXMiWdcsWhZAsA@???>
<f6aa5aab3f93aa5ca54307b4286f83ae@???>
<CAJ-QA9b0eEsb0nDx2chAduyahMPPzE3Os88RHcGhMD6VKOco7Q@???>
<13e01ebd5d94ebb42cd587a0485b087e@???>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 12:28:16 +0000
Message-ID: <CAJ-QA9YDbnA6iJySndgaoS4KQxUf1drQ-s0G6PY3uUou50UVeg@???>
From: David Paul <jedi58@???>
To: jan@???
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f234665418add04cff1e276
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Mon,
03 Dec 2012 12:28:22 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.217.176
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jedi58@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd0.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
* 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's * domain
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
* 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
* valid
* -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
low * trust
* [209.85.217.176 listed in list.dnswl.org]
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Cc: Bitfolk Users <users@???>
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Can't ping pear.php.net
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:28:23 -0000
--e89a8f234665418add04cff1e276
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Excellent - thanks a lot for your help :)
On 3 December 2012 12:27, <jan@???> wrote:
> nameserver 8.8.8.8
--e89a8f234665418add04cff1e276
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div class=3D"gmail_extra">Excellent - thanks a lot for your help :)</div><=
div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 3 December =
2012 12:27, <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"
mailto:jan@henkins.za.net" ta=
rget=3D"_blank">jan@???</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">nameserver 8.8.8.8</blockquote></div><br></d=
iv>
--e89a8f234665418add04cff1e276--
From jan@??? Mon Dec 03 12:28:56 2012
Received: from [2001:ba8:1f1:f0ef:216:3eff:fe14:ae03]
(helo=heimdall.henkins.za.net)
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <jan@???>) id 1TfV8q-0000vS-4g
for users@???; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:28:56 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by heimdall.henkins.za.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C9DE4C30F;
Mon, 3 Dec 2012 12:28:56 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-S
