-end for iptables?
> Arno's iptables seems well-regarded.
vim :)
> I've set up some basic iptables rules on my VPS that allow/block various
> ports etc but want to be able to use iptable's state module too and would
> like to use a script that's been proved through use.
>
> Thanks in advance for any help/ideas.
>
> Barry
(sorry, couldn't resist)
Stuart
--
Stuart Sears RHCA etc.
"It's today!" said Piglet.
"My favourite day," said Pooh.
From mail@??? Tue Oct 16 19:22:59 2012
Received: from mail-pa0-f48.google.com ([209.85.220.48])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mail@???>) id 1TOCjC-0003nE-SC
for users@???; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 19:22:59 +0000
Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id kp12so6501762pab.21
for <users@???>; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:22:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=google.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:content-type:x-gm-message-state;
bh=mImXPdHgpmyuFNzjjl+HG43NUhix/YMIFmLlzK9QLMQ=;
b=OB9pivlS05eElFuz70k3B3cOeWPp4A+yk/kGScMBflatolPQ8KQxZ/BslD8RQPxRpR
r7zYLfT+EvAQLU/6P+pvjzWbBuGwr0O/TKgHOqUoW7iMCbeHypZLRVenJ+xC0INDv0bl
ztqGC817kdRKrtWhoofD2OP4F+C4Crjatr8AbW/P0rc/58XMs/lxeZSmizaRSrrWt4A6
6s7HAXVEM+g0y+G39OwZc8BZyqTLaQ1ON3e8pO8SVURm+oxb09i83f1QzurynPgO0C5q
lDGsuo7StDNj4S0om19PCg9OEpaxQDZf7m7+UNwKHlC5br+byYO6/gRnMhThVwKeNhcD
8Jkg==
Received: by 10.68.190.197 with SMTP id gs5mr50298411pbc.124.1350415371099;
Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:22:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-da0-f48.google.com (mail-da0-f48.google.com
[209.85.210.48])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ky6sm11199922pbc.18.2012.10.16.12.22.50
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:22:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-da0-f48.google.com with SMTP id z8so3458181dad.21
for <users@???>; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:22:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.230.234 with SMTP id tb10mr49504435pbc.71.1350415370515;
Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:22:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.66.216.231 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:22:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <507DAFA8.4080501@???>
References: <CA+q7HTwsEfGBwXVW9xANKWXSW8DB2uao+pjc5LekZC5gzYvP-w@???>
<507DAFA8.4080501@???>
From: Amar Sood <mail@???>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 20:22:10 +0100
Message-ID: <CAHKeXQ3sCrXvqN=dZmLT6ORGdfD8xH-mjLtCjqcSiZrqA1TgZA@???>
To: users@???
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm+EQukL2u5TBTLShoXxsL/r96cTpW0Z+VN88ajByGedXfBnDnjx/hpuI4WovSvrbh88z6c
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Tue,
16 Oct 2012 19:22:59 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.220.48
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mail@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd1.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at
http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust
* [209.85.220.48 listed in list.dnswl.org]
* -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] iptable
