--
Richard Dignall
richard@???
www.bebackedup.co.uk
From peet@??? Thu Jul 12 19:35:05 2012
Received: from mead.hivemind.net ([41.76.209.65])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <peet@???>) id 1SpPAF-0003SZ-Uc
for users@???; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:35:05 +0000
Received: from 196-210-139-48.dynamic.isadsl.co.za ([196.210.139.48]:65371
helo=mac-wifi.peet.za.net)
by mead.hivemind.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.72 #1)
id 1SpPNc-0007SX-1W by authid <peet> with plain_courier_authdaemon
for <users@???>; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 21:48:52 +0200
Message-ID: <4FFF2705.8060104@???>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 21:35:33 +0200
From: Peet Grobler <peet@???>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@???
References: <20120707130537.GA11695@???>
<ECAE67DBAB7C44C2BA99DA232CC6E395@???>
<E8D012CEB3584285925AD3F1476D118B@???>
<20120707170729.GU3867@???>
In-Reply-To: <20120707170729.GU3867@???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Whitelisted: Authenticated sender, whitelisted
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Thu,
12 Jul 2012 19:35:04 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 41.76.209.65
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: peet@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN: AS3741 41.76.208.0/21
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED
shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at
http://www.dnswl.org/, * medium trust
* [41.76.209.65 listed in list.dnswl.org]
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Proving that you are you
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:35:08 -0000
On 2012-07-07 7:07 PM, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi Aaron,
>
> On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 05:38:13PM +0100, Aaron B. Russell wrote:
>> Rationale: you'd have a copy of that image file once I'd sent it to you, and chances are a few other people may have access to that image file, so verifying I actually had the real document would be somewhat important (though of course depending on the video quality this may not be a great solution as you might not be able to verify the document is the same one as in the image
)
>
> So are you saying that if
>
> - YOU had disabled the password reset, and
> - YOUR service were down, and
> - you were communicating with me via email (possibly from a
> different email address to the one in our database)
>
> YOU would not want me to reset your account password based on an
> image of a utility bill, but would insist upon a government ID that
> I recognise?
That makes sense, yes, however:
> Also what would be your suggestion regarding government IDs that I
> don't recognise (not all customers are from the UK)?
I don't think you'd know a real South African ID document or drivers
license from a fake one. How many other customers from how many other
countries do you have?
From peet@
