On 09/07/12 09:24, Chris Smith wrote:
> On 07/07/2012 14:05, Andy Smith wrote:
>>
> Out of curiosity, if you call out a locksmith because you've lost your
> house keys, how do they satisfy themselves that you are indeed the
> owner/occupant of the house?
Family photographs often help, it's also likely you'll have a passport
or other ID within the house that identifies you and matches the ID in
your wallet (assuming you still have that and only lost your keys).
n
From andyjpb@??? Thu Jul 12 14:58:18 2012
Received: from pavilion.ashurst.eu.org ([85.119.82.45])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <andyjpb@???>)
id 1SpKqQ-0000Wp-9p
for users@???; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:58:18 +0000
Received: from [74.125.61.190] (helo=[192.168.147.20])
by pavilion.ashurst.eu.org with esmtpsa
(TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <andyjpb@???>)
id 1SpKqN-0001sr-Nj; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:58:16 +0100
Message-ID: <4FFEE5F7.5050003@???>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:57:59 +0100
From: Andy Bennett <andyjpb@???>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:10.0.4) Gecko/20120510 Icedove/10.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Nigel Rantor <wiggly@???>
References: <20120707130537.GA11695@???> <4FFA9543.6010506@???>
<4FFEE17E.3050500@???>
In-Reply-To: <4FFEE17E.3050500@???>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT
shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT Not all rules were run,
due to a shortcircuited rule
* -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Thu,
12 Jul 2012 14:58:18 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 85.119.82.45
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andyjpb@???
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.bitfolk.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: users@???
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Proving that you are you
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:58:18 -0000
Hi,
>> Out of curiosity, if you call out a locksmith because you've lost your
>> house keys, how do they satisfy themselves that you are indeed the
>> owner/occupant of the house?
>
> Family photographs often help, it's also likely you'll have a passport
> or other ID within the house that identifies you and matches the ID in
> your wallet (assuming you still have that and only lost your keys).
"The Real Hustle" exposed a trick where you post your wallet through
someone else's letterbox and then use it to prove that it's your house.
Regards,
@ndy
--
andyjpb@???
http://www.ashurst.eu.org/
0x7EBA75FF
From cabalamat@??? Thu Jul 12 18:04:02 2012
Received: from mail-ob0-f176.google.com ([209.85.214.176])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <cabalamat@???>) id 1SpNk8-00087z-UE
for users@???; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 18:04:01 +0000
Received: by obbtb18 with SMTP id tb18so5012918obb.21
for <users@???>; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:03:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type; bh=asL4lGjIgHylngSkQjjUefvbWh/vPGXM626ERlwSpb0=;
b=C68u/zuJ8ByYEkB08N+aBhY/3IkiVDYNV/JL3C8JzoDxI/pSEMcRKlFPISa5yLdCJz
EcckTDnSlKe8dP4dRYw1FAdvQb2hHH1T7Zjru2usGZaqxl84ODUkZU1Oi5+25qZ7VKoY
Ps+JgZkPcAcbNH4+UjeLDmGypsiMrUJsYbvOU8Fa7GoiAi5Wb2WxunH5Zyh8UDwhPK54
CW/zaGlDGJK20fpqFBGryisgE+xHXj6cvsQiOZVcJ2GPjFzW1+c/QaN64t68BpabYHoR
4nYbAv7QFRYhqPIgtYzSuFv76PtnSkABtazA5Q6wAiel00YPkD6piMvadywTA4rPnKNT
hYTw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.47.9 with SMTP id z9mr19499408obm.58.1342116233552; Thu,
12 Jul 2012 11:03:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.76.70.168 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:03:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4FFA9543.6010506@???>
References: <20120707130537.GA11695@???> <4FFA9543.6010506@???>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:03:53 +0100
Message-ID: <CANrmF71Z83zwBcBCZj8ekmj4mNE8+qg1UTXL4tAreZug5y7-EA@???>
From: Philip Hunt <cabalamat@???>
To: users@???
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Thu,
12 Jul 2012 18:04:01 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.214.176
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: cabalamat@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd2.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
DKIM_VALID_AU, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at
http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust
* [209.85.214.176 listed in list.dnswl.org]
* -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's * domain
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
* 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
* valid
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Proving that you are you
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request
