7091331520.3156.UDXSUCGA%phil-bitfolk-users@???>
<20120709151047.GW11695@???>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 18:16:53 +0100
From: "Mathew Newton" <bitfolklist@???>
To: users@???
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-bitfolk.com-Metrics-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for
2001:ba8:1f1:f137::2 (failed)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Mon,
09 Jul 2012 17:16:54 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:ba8:1f1:f137::2
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: bitfolklist@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT
shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT Not all rules were run,
due to a shortcircuited rule
* -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Proving that you are you
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 17:16:55 -0000
Hi Andy,
On Mon, July 9, 2012 4:10 pm, Andy Smith wrote:
> What I am going to do is talk to just the customers who have
> disabled email password resets and come up with some process that
> suits the majority of them.
>
> I don't mind discussing things amongst the wider customer base but I
> feel like we are getting mired down in suggested processes which
> will only ever apply to hypothetical other people. On this, I'd
> rather consult with the people it is more likely to affect.
Those whose e-mail resides on their VPS may be equally effected given the
potential that e-mail password reset may not be viable but would fall
outside of your scope if you take it off-list.
As mitigation against this particular circumstance I would welcome the
inclusion of a secondary e-mail address within the control panel such tha=
t
e-mail password reset could still be an option should the worst happen.
Mathew
From pveale@??? Wed Jul 11 09:20:25 2012
Received: from mail-yw0-f53.google.com ([209.85.213.53])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <pveale@???>) id 1Sot5s-00028Q-Tb
for users@???; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 09:20:25 +0000
Received: by yhp26 with SMTP id 26so1178500yhp.26
for <users@???>; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 02:20:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=Q8NAHAgVXU3H2fAKk23AMKJQ8p64e5CnBStVaF/r2zw=;
b=R4rJ76SFPV9XLhW0YGMppAzRhnGMgSP6GykBXfvdXCuiHZcJ+RogNL95RBw2hfwMYC
f6kkxLdkHNqxvU/2ggD0yOZfKnj3VwF8HMlf3/JOMn5zTrfP1YezsG6uyITX8XVX3O7f
KsOU8Kr7XpEfF6EMftvqxixMUMDC72jn02aiSS5R5RJqjH9JN/7AUEwWK1XLwpg2YWJW
mnjNcukhIMIYUSLwfkTqg/V3RzDVr/T+mzxVdt0UshPdIYi2sztmwuKYeYMBcXHmnmly
PaREmH9OGluf8yqhQQiHClJWndtWkOU1nAD7R7BwWeRMNFNG0avE4K1EmULWMNpJ4+Wk
hiNQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.66.85.231 with SMTP id k7mr80401875paz.76.1341998417276; Wed,
11 Jul 2012 02:20:17 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: pveale@???
Received: by 10.68.54.3 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 02:20:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <cf66f3c72ac6f92de79ab05de81c0aaa.squirrel@???>
References: <20120707130537.GA11695@???>
<201207081645.39704.andyparkins@???>
<1207091331520.3156.UDXSUCGA%phil-bitfolk-users@???>
<20120709151047.GW11695@???>
<cf66f3c72ac6f92de79ab05de81c0aaa.squirrel@???>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:20:17 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: lBzIauSWRQ-GnA8qhhhEX6kOVuI
Message-ID: <CADDPZSjiUcC81fKYO-o9F=KL8yM7W_SZH9VmmSST-diuHt2j7w@???>
From: Philip Veale <email@???>
To: BitFolk Users <users@???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Wed,
11 Jul 2012 09:20:25 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.213.53
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: pveale@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd1.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at
http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust
* [209.85.213.53 listed in list.dnswl.org]
* -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
* 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
* valid
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Proving that you are you
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 09:20:26 -0000
Take the customers' mobile phone number at sign up time and send them
their details by SMS.
Although apparently Google are incredible 'Evil' for doing this sort
of thing. Um, really?
From duane@??? Wed Jul 11 09:35:46 2012
Received: from mail.aus-biz.com ([208.82.100.153])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <duane@???>) id 1SotKg-0002oR-Lb
for users@???; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 09:35:46 +0000
Received: from [192.168.2.141] (220-245-82-41.static.tpgi.com.au
[220.245.82.41])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
by mail.aus-biz.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F87CFF2D3
for <users@???>; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 19:29:18 +1000 (EST)
Message-ID: <4FFD4767.3020801@???>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 19:29:11 +1000
From: Duane <duane@???>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@???
References: <201207071
