Re: [bitfolk] Tor Obsfucation

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Kai Hendry
Date:  
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Tor Obsfucation
Cheers,
Andy

--=20
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting

--JCIJwDXlZmsNNBnR
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEAREDAAYFAk/4cj0ACgkQIJm2TL8VSQsLDgCeMbRJtIUKpc+Z+P1YdFDHH0EH
qecAoM/406RF71OVf3HZVbDki1TFAlZB
=OPV0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--JCIJwDXlZmsNNBnR--


From aaron@??? Sat Jul 07 17:38:26 2012
Received: from phoenixsupport.org ([2001:ba8:1f1:f1de::f5:c]
    helo=server02.filesanctuary.net)
    by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
    (envelope-from <aaron@???>) id 1SnYxe-000394-JI
    for users@???; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 17:38:26 +0000
Received: from [192.168.0.10]
    (cpc1-stkn14-2-0-cust232.11-2.cable.virginmedia.com [86.30.8.233])
    by server02.filesanctuary.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AA9348A2C0;
    Sat,  7 Jul 2012 18:38:25 +0100 (BST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=unadopted.co.uk;
    s=2012; t=1341682705;
    bh=7Gjf4Gn6I5Ju6kKuHIBlG0To8QJuzGfZxBF4SnnqfSY=;
    h=Date:From:To:Cc:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:
    MIME-Version:Content-Type;
    b=WGEilpRc6mT+BvGIZT1pHVeU9dY5g5ba4ICpaYyDtI6L1iqpXBsOZ8iwBnjUGhG0N
    k21880uhYpyGdZX4w5ZR/s+v04cTq6hQm+X9jT3JIJyCUq2tSqDRylrYjpCmxE9K0x
    wazUQhAhfPCavfVWubNCsKc4UZLBfdGeWwYCSHSo=
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 18:38:25 +0100
From: "Aaron B. Russell" <aaron@???>
To: Andy Smith <andy@???>
Message-ID: <12139C255B444257A656308EA239D9E2@???>
In-Reply-To: <20120707173037.GX3867@???>
References: <20120707130537.GA11695@???>
    <ECAE67DBAB7C44C2BA99DA232CC6E395@???>
    <E8D012CEB3584285925AD3F1476D118B@???>
    <20120707170729.GU3867@???>
    <3B35605E52F04AE2817487EE7C3EE903@???>
    <20120707173037.GX3867@???>
X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.1 (build 1081.52)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="4ff87411_6a3b714c_8726"
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Sat,
    07 Jul 2012 17:38:26 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:ba8:1f1:f1de::f5:c
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: aaron@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
    spamd2.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT
    shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT Not all rules were run,
    due to a shortcircuited rule
    * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Cc: users@???
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Proving that you are you
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 17:38:26 -0000


--4ff87411_6a3b714c_8726
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

> I like this option far less than my suggestion that anyone who
> wanted to disable password resets would have to upload a PGP or SSH
> key first.
> =20
> =20



I suppose if people are so concerned about disabling password resets, the=
n it isn't really unreasonable to expect them to send public keys to you =
i