Re: [bitfolk] IP address at Nominet's nameservers is wrong

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Daniel Néri
Date:  
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] IP address at Nominet's nameservers is wrong
--4ff8710f_11b1cc33_8726
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

> So are you saying that if
>
> - YOU had disabled the password reset, and
> - YOUR service were down, and
> - you were communicating with me via email (possibly from a
> different email address to the one in our database)
>
> YOU would not want me to reset your account password based on an
> image of a utility bill, but would insist upon a government ID that
> I recognise?
>
>
>



To clarify: if there is a better solution than a government ID image, then let's explore those options. But being able to gain access to my account by supplying a potentially 'shopped utility bill seems risky to me.
--
Aaron B. Russell
http://unadopted.co.uk
+44 20 3137 4147








--4ff8710f_11b1cc33_8726
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline


                <div style=3D=22font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 13px; =
=22><blockquote type=3D=22cite=22 style=3D=22border-left-style: solid; bo=
rder-left-color: rgb(0, 33, 98); border-top-width: 1px; border-right-widt=
h: 1px; border-bottom-width: 1px; border-left-width: 1px; color: rgb(0, 3=
3, 98); margin-left: 0px; padding-left: 10px; padding-right: 0px; margin-=
right: 0px; display: block; =22><div><span><div><div><div>So are you sayi=
ng that if</div><div><br></div><div>- YOU had disabled the password reset=
, and</div><div>- YOUR service were down, and</div><div>- you were commun=
icating with me via email (possibly from a</div><div>different email addr=
ess to the one in our database)</div><div><br></div><div>YOU would not wa=
nt me to reset your account password based on an</div><div>image of a uti=
lity bill, but would insist upon a government ID that</div><div>I recogni=
se=3F</div></div></div></span></div></blockquote></div>
                <div><div>To clarify: if there is a better solution than =
a government ID image, then let's explore those options. But being able t=
o gain access to my account by supplying a potentially 'shopped utility b=
ill seems risky to me.</div><div><div><div>--&nbsp;<br>Aaron B. Russell<b=
r></div><div>http://unadopted.co.uk</div><div>+44 20 3137 4147</div></div=

></div></div>

                =20
                <p style=3D=22color: =23A0A0A8;=22><br></p>


--4ff8710f_11b1cc33_8726--



From prvs=05351536fb=dmitriy.kazimirov@??? Sat Jul 07 17:06:32 2012
Received: from mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.71])
    by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
    (Exim 4.72)
    (envelope-from <prvs=05351536fb=dmitriy.kazimirov@???>)
    id 1SnYSl-0000U6-Hm
    for users@???; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 17:06:32 +0000
Received: from gw.viorsan.com ([92.255.176.201])
    by mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
    (Exim 4.72)
    (envelope-from <prvs=05351536fb=dmitriy.kazimirov@???>)
    id 1SnYSJ-0003A2-1H
    for users@???; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 17:06:03 +0000
X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS
X-Originating-IP: 92.255.176.201
X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@??? (see
    http://www.dyndns.com/services/mailhop/outbound_abuse.html for
    abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1+IWRP/OnNHizdWmZ5iR0W+
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=viorsan.com;
    s=mail; 
    h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject;
    bh=yjD2UGjG9aLDHelHYiwHOsw0l/tYaGgSUMQdQwm1/Ko=; 
    b=WBSPK2dSE59t16wAjx9XtRtlxn8a5+hGrJH1b3/KdGGvV2GQTrAzekRA1bRRA2AlJgPaudx8l9fv8HwZWn66MIf/ttGURG/8065nyncy9VAJk2saV6P9EcLhDABYpfWoPFrFDD5YY1h6SmB/uzI9KU+X4HORS8aHAnMXUSEYDW0=;
Received: from inari4.viorsan.com ([10.