--4ff86e51_3b594807_8726--
From andy@??? Sat Jul 07 17:19:44 2012
Received: from andy by mail.bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1SnYfY-0001fb-2q
for users@???; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 17:19:44 +0000
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 17:19:44 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20120707171943.GV3867@???>
References: <20120707130537.GA11695@???>
<ECAE67DBAB7C44C2BA99DA232CC6E395@???>
<CANrmF72gZDi8+7g9sfVZrD7d3CEjF_8WO2B+y7m92Ak+0yRT=Q@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IOWfJl95iVQnrM9l"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CANrmF72gZDi8+7g9sfVZrD7d3CEjF_8WO2B+y7m92Ak+0yRT=Q@???>
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Sat,
07 Jul 2012 17:19:44 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andy@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd2.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RELAYS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Proving that you are you
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 17:19:44 -0000
--IOWfJl95iVQnrM9l
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Philip,
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 06:03:18PM +0100, Philip Hunt wrote:
> On 7 July 2012 17:35, Aaron B. Russell <aaron@???> wrote:
> > What about a scan of a government-issued ID (eg passport/driver's licen=
se),
> > and perhaps a quick Skype video call to prove that I actually had said
> > document in my possession (as opposed to just having an image file which
> > could have been)?
>=20
> I much prefer the idea ofd a passport (with skype call) to a scan of a
> utility bill.
Sorry, I'm not doing skype or any kind of video chat. We will have
to agree on something else.
> Anyone who knows someones name and address can probably forge a scan
> of a utility bill fairly easily.
I would have thought that it is not very much harder for someone
with a UK passport to photoshop an image of it with any name they
like on it, good enough for a scan or video chat. I don't know what
most customers look like. I don't know what most non-UK passports
loo
